That's not a namespaces issue per se, that's something introduced by the new list tables API. In 0.94, it returns table names as String. Originally I did it that way for 0.95/0.96 but TableName is used for other name related APIs, so was inconsistent, so I changed it. I did not notice the breakage and we don't have coverage for that in TestShell. In this case I think we should relax the check in TableName because system table names can have "illegal" characters. Or, I can have the list tables API in 0.95/0.96 return String like 0.94.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Devaraj Das <[email protected]> wrote: > Basics worked fine. I raised > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9251 for a namespace issue. > Not > sure how much weight do we want to put in on this one for the RC > validation.. > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Given that this can potentially be the base release for 96, should we > > wait for HBASE-8165 (protobuf upgrade to 2.5) to go in? > > Hadoop 2.1.0-beta release vote is currently ongoing. > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as > > 0.95. > > > 2? > > > > > > Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the > vote > > > period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release > has > > to > > > just basically "work". > > > > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/ > > > > > > ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2]. > > > > > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and > of > > > course, > > > any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like > > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is > > > palatable. > > > > > > This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can > > think > > > of this > > > release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95 > > > branch. Only > > > fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96 > > > from 0.95 > > > branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning > > > 2. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC > > > 3. > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/ > > > > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
