Hi St.Ack, I will open the relate JIRAs in few minutes.
Regarding performances, RandomSeekScanTest is way slower, and only RandomScanWithRange100Test was faster. Others were similar. For RandomScanWithRange100Test I suspect that I don't have the right number for 0.94 so 0.94.11 tests are running right now on the same server with the same configuration. I will start to have numbers by end of day, else, tomorrow morning, but will most probably take about 24h to get all of them. JM 2013/9/2 Stack <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Got it. >> >> I can't run the integration tests for now because I'm lacking some >> servers :( Need to complete some HBase on RAID tests before I can get >> those new servers >> >> First thing is, start-hbase.cmd has the execute flag set. I don't >> think it's required. And it will help with tabulation feature if we >> can un-set it. >> >> For 0.96.0RC0 here are my results: >> First, I get 2 .out files. each time I start the server, instead of >> usually one... With the same timestamp. >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 jmspaggiari jmspaggiari 0 Aug 31 15:38 >> hbase-jmspaggiari-master-t430s.out >> -rw-r--r-- 1 jmspaggiari jmspaggiari 0 Aug 31 15:38 >> hbase-jmspaggiari-master-t430s.out.1 >> >> >> In the UI, we say "The .META. table holds references to all User Table >> regions" but the table name is "hbase:meta" and not ".META." >> >> On the logs, I found this exception that I did not had before: >> 2013-08-31 18:45:05,490 WARN >> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:2181] server.NIOServerCnxn: >> caught end of stream exception >> EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client >> sessionid 0x140d68bb9d50004, likely client has closed socket >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:220) >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >> >> >> I ran PE over 48h. I don't have another 0.96 baseline to compare with, >> so I compared with 0.94. >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomSeekScanTest is >> about 3 times slower with 0.96. >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomScanWithRange100Test >> seems to be 2 times faster. >> >> Writes also are faster but I changed my hard drive since I ran 0.94. >> So I'm currently re-running 0.94 and will provide another more >> accurate comparison soon. >> >> Ran LoadTestTool: Failed to write keys: 0 >> >> I have not been able to run IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify nor >> IntegrationTestBigLinkedList because of the lack of servers. >> >> So overall, it seems to be working fine, but I have not been able to >> test this release as deeply as I'm usually testing the 0.94 releases. >> > > Thank you for taking it for a spin JMS -- you the man. If you don't open > issues for the teething stuff, I will. > > So 0.96 is slower doing RandomSeekScanTest but faster on your other tests? > I can take a look too. > > St.Ack
