So I posted an update in HBASE-9338[1]. For me this sinks the release and I'm -1 biding until we can figure out what's causing this data loss.
Thanks Devaraj for testing. Good to know that others are also seeing a failure. If other could test too I would really appreciate it. 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9338#comment-13760594 On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release. It is intended to supplant >> the 0.94.x series. >> >> hbase-0.96.0RC0 is our first candidate for release hbase-0.96.0. >> >> The signed tarballs are available here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC0/ >> >> The hbase built against hadoop1 artifacts are here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-126/ >> >> The hbase built against hadoop2 artifacts are here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-127/ >> >> Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and >> runs on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x. You must chose the hbase >> that suits your hadoop context. >> >> Almost 2k issues [1] are attributed to this version (counting fixes done >> against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases). Almost 100 >> fixes have been committed since 0.95.2. I will follow up w/ a synopsis of >> the major changes. >> >> Please take it for a spin. We are interested in any issues found but in >> particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a >> 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [2]. >> >> Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0? Please vote +/-1 by September >> 9th. >> >> >> St.Ack >> > > Its looking like Elliott has an issue to sink this RC but while he's > figuring it, is there any other feedback on this RC? It would be good to > get issues now early so we can get them fixed before we cut he next > candidate. > > Thanks, > St.Ack
