I am going through the 0.95-0.96 issues applying this decision now. St.Ack
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The argument for excluding the 0.96 tag makes sense. Can we agree to do >> this: >> >> Commit only to trunk: Mark with 0.98 >> Commit to 0.95 and trunk : Mark with 0.98, and 0.95.x >> Commit to 0.94.x and 0.95, and trunk: Mark with 0.98, 0.95.x, and 0.94.x >> Commit to 89-fb: Mark with 89-fb. >> Commit site fixes: no version >> >> > I added the above agreement to the refguide: > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#decisions > > I fixed issues that were resolved w/ 0.95.0 adding 0.98.0 as per above. > > >> Should we remove 0.96 tag for now until the branch appears again? >> > > I removed it. > > Good on you lads, > St.Ack >
