Yeah, let's get some info in the book. At least what are the options for compression.
Enis On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > For completeness, here's an entry for LZ4: > > +--------------------+--------------+ > | compression:LZ4 | 391017061 | > +--------------------+--------------+ > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Do we have a consolidated resource with information and recommendations > > about use of the above? For instance, I ran a simple test using > > PerformanceEvaluation, examining just the size of data on disk for 1G of > > input data. The matrix below has some surprising results: > > > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | MODIFIER | SIZE (bytes) | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | none | 1108553612 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | compression:SNAPPY | 427335534 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | compression:LZO | 270422088 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | compression:GZ | 152899297 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | codec:PREFIX | 1993910969 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | codec:DIFF | 1960970083 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | codec:FAST_DIFF | 1061374722 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > | codec:PREFIX_TREE | 1066586604 | > > +--------------------+--------------+ > > > > Where does a wayward soul look for guidance on which combination of the > > above to choose for their application? > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > >
