Stack did you tag the RC2 in svn? I do not see it: Eniss-MacBook-Pro:hbase$ svn ls https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/tags| grep 0.96 0.96.0RC0/ 0.96.0RC1/
Enis On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > This candidate was sunk by HBASE-9581 (a little birdy flew by and committed > a small change that broke our unit test build). > New one coming right up (I'm getting fast at RC-making). > St.Ack > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release. It is intended to > supplant > > > the 0.94.x series. > > > > > > hbase-0.96.0RC2 is our third hbase-0.96.0 release candidate. > > > > > > The signed tarballs are available here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.0RC2/< > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC0/> > > > > > > > Fair warning to people downloading from the second link without looking > at > > it, it's RC0 and not RC2. > > > > > > > > > > Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and > > runs > > > on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x. You must chose the hbase > that > > > suits your hadoop context. > > > > > > Both sets of hbase artifacts, for hadoop1 and for hadoop2, are > available > > in > > > this maven staging repo: > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-076/ > > > > > > More than 2k issues [1] are attributed to this version (counting fixes > > done > > > against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases). More than > 180 > > > fixes have been committed since 0.95.2. I will follow up w/ a synopsis > > of > > > the major changes (I know I said this about last few RC.... I still > need > > to > > > go through all issues... but I've made a start). > > > > > > Please take it for a spin. We are interested in any issues found but > in > > > particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a > > > 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [2]. > > > > > > Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0? Please vote +/-1 by > September > > > 26th. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20(%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.96.0%22%20or%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.0%22%20%20or%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20or%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20)%20AND%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved%20OR%20status%20%3D%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC > > > 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96 > > > > > >
