Integration testing revealed HBASE-9639 last week. I think secure deployments are common enough to make failing bulkloads a terminal bug for this RC.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release. It is intended to supplant > the 0.94.x series. > > hbase-0.96.0RC3 is our fourth hbase-0.96.0 release candidate. > > The signed tarballs are available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.0RC3/< > http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC0/> > > Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and runs > on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x. You must chose the hbase that > suits your hadoop context. > > Both sets of hbase artifacts, for hadoop1 and for hadoop2, are available in > this maven staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-087/ > > More than 2k issues [1][2][3][4] are attributed to this version (counting > fixes done against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases). More > than 200 fixes have been committed since 0.95.2. Synopsis of the main > changes between 0.94.x and 0.96.x will follow soon. > > Please take it for a spin. We are interested in any issues found but in > particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a > 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [5]. > > Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0? Please vote +/-1 by September > 30th. > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > 1. 0.96.0 205 issues http://goo.gl/wLmu1Y > 2. 0.95.2 340 issues http://goo.gl/4djjE9 > 3. 0.95.1 265 issues http://goo.gl/TcdckW > 4. 0.95.0 1263 issues http://goo.gl/Iqcx2i > 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96 >
