+1 I did the following on a single node cluster which runs HBase against hadoop-2:
Checked out layouts for artifacts Ran TestAcidGuarantees Performed several commands using HBase shell Ran rowcounter on a small table and verified the result through shell 'count' command. All was good. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Spent the day testing the RC. Here is my +1 based on: > > - Downloaded artifacts for -hadoop1-bin -hadoop2-bin and -src > - Verified checksums for the artifacts (except for RMD160) > Note: It would be useful if we can get these in a machine readable > format to do automated verification with {sha*|md5}sum -c (for the next > time) > - Verified signatures > - Checked out documentation > - Checked out layouts for artifacts > - Verified hadoop versions > - Run local cluster > - Build source artifact with hadoop1 and hadoop2 > - Run small unit tests > - Deployed on a 7 node cluster with hadoop-2 > - Run small tests including LoadTestTool, ITBigLinkedList, ITLoadAndVerify > and some shell smoke tests > > Plus we have been running the tip of 0.96 branch through our test harness > including many IT's with and without CM configurations. > > Let's ship it ! > > Enis > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Devaraj Das <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1. Based on some large scale tests with bits very close to RC5. Found > two > > issues - HBASE-9773 and HBASE-9777 and neither of them are release > blockers > > in my mind. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release. It is intended to > supplant > > > the 0.94.x series. > > > > > > hbase-0.96.0RC5 is our sixth hbase-0.96.0 release candidate. > > > > > > The signed tarballs are available here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.0RC5< > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/> > > > / <http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/> > > > > > > Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and > > runs > > > on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x. You must chose the hbase > that > > > suits your hadoop context. > > > > > > Both sets of hbase artifacts, for hadoop1 and for hadoop2, are > available > > in > > > this maven staging repo: > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-165/ > > > > > > More than 2k issues [1][2][3][4] are attributed to this version > (counting > > > fixes done against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases). > > More > > > than 250 fixes have been committed since 0.95.2. Synopsis of the main > > > changes between 0.94.x and 0.96.x will follow soon. > > > > > > Please take it for a spin. We are interested in any issues found but > in > > > particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a > > > 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [5]. > > > > > > Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0? Please vote +/-1 by Friday, > > > October 18th. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > 1. 0.96.0 266 issues http://goo.gl/wLmu1Y > > > 2. 0.95.2 340 issues http://goo.gl/4djjE9 > > > 3. 0.95.1 265 issues http://goo.gl/TcdckW > > > 4. 0.95.0 1263 issues http://goo.gl/Iqcx2i > > > 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96 > > > > > > > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > >
