That's my understanding - keeping Hadoop QA integration. 

On Oct 25, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't really care. I will follow.
> 
> I suppose we will keep our integration with JIRA, so we will have to submit
> a patch anyway to get it validated by pre-commit stuff?
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sergey Shelukhin 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> +1, also only use svn to commit
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1000.
>>> 
>>> Enis
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1.  I've actually only used SVN to commit patches.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd suggest we maintain the same commit style (straight line rebased
>>>> commits per release branch, branches off trunk for major features)
>> after
>>>> the move to git as opposed to the github style (lots of branch/merges).
>>>> 
>>>> Jon.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 I've actually been using git to do most of my work lately.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:16 AM, 黄浩松 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> git is more powerful and flexible.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2013/10/26 Ted Yu <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>> +1 too.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jesse Yates <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do all my work in git anyways :)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 25, 2013, Stack wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> At yesterday's dev meetup -- minutes to follow -- it was
>>> suggested
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> move
>>>>>>>>> the project to git as our repo of truth.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What do folks think?  How patches are contributed and
>> committer
>>>> will
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> to change to match git-flow.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Josh Eiser, an accumulo committer, was at the dev meetup
>>> yesterday
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> kind enough to write up the steps involved moving their
>> project
>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>> the discussion on how they come up w/ a process in particular.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: Josh Elser <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:25 AM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Accumulo's transition to git
>>>>>>>>> To: Stack <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Stack,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> As promised, here's the info that I had collected when
>> Accumulo
>>>> made
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> transition from SVN to Git.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Make sure you have some mailing list consensus, and then open
>> up
>>>> an
>>>>>> INFRA
>>>>>>>>> ticket. For us, we requested the following things
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1. Specify which SVN branches you want in Git, and if you want
>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> renamed. Also, which you want the default Git branch to be on
>>>> clone.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2. If you have any contribs, specify which other SVN path you
>>> want
>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> own Git repos.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 3. Specify the format of the subject for the git commit
>>>>> notifications
>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>> and to which mailing list.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 4. Request update of mirroring on git.a.o and
>>> github.com/apache/.
>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 5. Transition from svn2jira to git2jira (honestly, I don't
>>>> remember
>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>> this was anymore.. maybe commenting on Jira for issue mentions
>>> in
>>>>>>>> commits)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 6. Request delivery of pull-requests to a given mailing list.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 7. Request update reviewboard to the new repo.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Our INFRA ticket can be found at [1]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> FWIW, we also had a huge discussion about how we were going to
>>> use
>>>>>> Git so
>>>>>>>>> that we didn't constantly duplicate a bunch of commits
>>>>> cherry-picking
>>>>>>>>> changes everywhere. There was a bunch of teaching we had to do
>>> to
>>>>> make
>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>> we had a good commit history and could still use features like
>>>>>>>> git-bisect.
>>>>>>>>> The result of that is at [2].
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Joe Stein also sent us Kafka's use of Git that was helpful
>> when
>>>>>> writing
>>>>>>>>> down how users should contribute patches. [3]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I hope all this helps! Despite the pain we went through in
>>> getting
>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> set up (dealing with coordination of INFRA to lock the SVN
>>> repos,
>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>> to Git, verify accuracy, and people who then didn't know how
>> to
>>>> use
>>>>>>>> Git), I
>>>>>>>>> think everyone is happy we did it.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6392<
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6392>
>>>>>>>>> [2] http://accumulo.apache.org/**git.html<
>>>>>>>>> http://accumulo.apache.org/git.html>
>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/KAFKA/Git+**Workflow
>> <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Git+Workflow>
>>>>>>>>> [4] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------------------
>>>>>>>> Jesse Yates
>>>>>>>> @jesse_yates
>>>>>>>> jyates.github.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Haosdent Huang
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>>>> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>> // [email protected]
>> 
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> 

Reply via email to