We should open a JIRA for adding more optional members to the Thrift
Mutation union for the currently lacking ops.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:54 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>This TMutation is used with Atomic mutation of a row. There we can only
> pass Put/Delete. See HRegion for impl also
> I saw this implementation.
> The point is Increment/Append extends Mutation as per the definition in
> java. Hence in thrift also we could have it like that.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Found that the thrift does not have the support for Append
> > Yes I too can not see. Missed before?
> > >also that under
> > mutations we have only Put and Delete
> >
> > This TMutation is used with Atomic mutation of a row. There we can only
> > pass Put/Delete. See HRegion for impl also
> >
> > -Anoop-
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:06 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Devs
> > >
> > > Found that the thrift does not have the support for Append, also that
> > under
> > > mutations we have only Put and Delete. The Append and Increment does
> not
> > > fall under the mutations.
> > >
> > > {code}
> > > /**
> > > * Atomic mutation for the specified row. It can be either Put or
> Delete.
> > > */
> > > union TMutation {
> > > 1: optional TPut put,
> > > 2: optional TDelete deleteSingle,
> > > }
> > > {code}
> > > Was it done intentionally? Or they are things to be done on thrift ?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ram
> > >
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
