+1 Checked packages.
Configured security and did a simple local load test, nothing strange noted. Configured without and did a simple local load test, nothing strange noted. On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:50 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Nick and Ted. > > Myself: > - Loaded 50m rows, scanned, flushed, scanned, compacted, scanned > - Checked signatures, documentation, etc > - Connected with old client testing various operations > - Did some high level tests with Phoenix > - Verified scan/put performance > > > +1 > > I will release 0.94.14 later today or tomorrow. > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > To: hbase-dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:29 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 2nd hbase 0.94.14 release candidate is available > for download > > > Similar dance as the last time: > > - downloaded tarballs, both passed md5 and asc verification. [✓] > - load 10m rows/host into a 0.94.6.1 secured cluster (sequentialWrite > --nomapred), launch randomRead (--nomapred) test. > - deployed 0.94.14 jars over existing 0.94.6.1 regionservers, restart one > by one. [✓] > - new job launched from 0.94.6.1 "gateway" host, with older jars installed > (randomRead, mapreduce). [✓] > - deployed 0.94.13 jars over existing 0.94.6.1 master, restart. [✓] > - manually split test table while job running. [✓] > > I noticed that it took a little while for the RS's to open regions and > start serving requests once it came back online after the upgrade. I didn't > record stats the last time I did this and didn't log events that closely > this time either, so I don't have anything concrete for comparison. It just > seemed slower than perhaps it should. No errors in the logs either, so > *shrug* > > +1. > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:18 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The 2nd 0.94.14 RC is available for download at > > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.14-rc1/ > > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 > > > > As before 0.94.14 is mostly a bug fix release along with some > significance > > performance improvements: > > [HBASE-9165] - Improvements to addDependencyJars > > [HBASE-9138] - getHaseIntegrationTestingUtility() is misspelled > > [HBASE-9799] - Change Hadoop 1.2 dependency to 1.2.1 > > [HBASE-9809] - RegionTooBusyException should provide region name > which > > was too busy > > [HBASE-9834] - Minimize byte[] copies for 'smart' clients > > [HBASE-9849] - [REST] Forbidden schema delete in read only mode > > [HBASE-9850] - Issues with UI for table compact/split operation > > completion. After split/compaction operation using UI, the page is not > > automatically redirecting back using IE8/Firefox. > > [HBASE-9865] - Reused WALEdits in replication may cause RegionServers > > to go OOM > > [HBASE-9872] - ModifyTable does not modify the attributes of a newly > > modified/changed ColumnDescriptor > > [HBASE-9890] - MR jobs are not working if started by a delegated user > > [HBASE-9902] - Region Server is starting normally even if clock skew > > is more than default 30 seconds(or any configured). -> Regionserver node > > time is greater than master node time > > [HBASE-9906] - Restore snapshot fails to restore the meta edits > > sporadically > > [HBASE-9915] - Performance: isSeeked() in EncodedScannerV2 always > > returns false > > [HBASE-9952] - Snapshot restore may fail due to NullPointerException > > [HBASE-9956] - Remove keyLength cache from KeyValue > > [HBASE-9970] - HBase BulkLoad, table is creating with the timestamp > > key also as a column to the table. > > [HBASE-9971] - Port part of HBASE-9958 to 0.94 - change lock scope in > > locateRegion > > [HBASE-9975] - Not starting ReplicationSink when using custom > > implementation for the ReplicationSink. > > [HBASE-9993] - 0.94: HBASE-9865 breaks coprocessor compatibility with > > WALEdit. > > [HBASE-4654] - [replication] Add a check to make sure we don't > > replicate to ourselves > > [HBASE-8438] - Extend bin/hbase to print a "mapreduce classpath" > > [HBASE-9715] - Backport -in_memory option support for LoadTestTool > > from trunk > > [HBASE-9831] - 'hbasefsck.numthreads' property isn't passed to hbck > > via cmdline -D option > > [HBASE-9894] - remove the inappropriate assert statement in > > Store.getSplitPoint() > > [HBASE-9963] - Remove the ReentrantReadWriteLock in the MemStore > > [HBASE-8397] - improve unit-test coverage of package > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.metrics (0.94) > > [HBASE-8543] - fix coverage org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.client > > [HBASE-8552] - fix coverage org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.filter > > [HBASE-8556] - fix coverage org.apache.hadoop.hbase.metrics.histogram > > [HBASE-8557] - fix coverage org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.metrics > > [HBASE-8559] - increase unit-test coverage of package > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor > > > > I am especially exited about HBASE-9915, which provides a 2x scan > > performance improvement with block encoders; and HBASE-9865, which > > significantly reduces memory consumption used by replication. > > > > The list of changes is also available here: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325047 > > > > Here're the jenkins runs for this RC: > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.14/13/ and > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.14-security/13/ > > > > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and > > vote +1/-1 by EOD November 22nd on whether we should release this as > > 0.94.14. > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- Lars > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
