You can not send pictures to the list. Please post it on an external website and provide the link here.
2013/11/25 Vladimir Rodionov <[email protected]> > Where is the picture, Jerry? > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jerry He <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Re-attach the performance comparison picture. > > > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The picture didn't go through. > >> > >> Correction: the comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and 0.96.1 was done by > >> Nicolas Liochon. This was not done at EBay. > >> > >> In my talk, there was another comparison to show that MTTR improved a > lot > >> from 0.94 to 0.96 - this was done at EBay. > >> > >> When Stack cuts 0.96.1 RC0, you would get the list of JIRAs that > >> contributed to the speedup from 0.96.0 to 0.96.1 > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Jerry He <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, Ted, and hbase experts > >> > > >> > Below picture is a performance comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and > >> 0.96.1, > >> > shared by Ted Yu in China Hadoop Summit today. This perf testing is > >> said to > >> > be executed on ebay's real cluster. > >> > > >> > It is surprising 0.96.0 is such worse compared to 0.96.1 and even > >> 0.94.14. > >> > Are these numbers official and the performance degradation true? > What > >> > patch in 0.96.1 fixed this? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
