Why do you think I got excited? I do not work for MapR. MapR has posted benchmark results and some numbers for HBase look quite low. I thought may be community will be interested in these results.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > Excuse me if I do not get too exited about a report published by MapR that > comes to the conclusion that MapR's M7 is faster than "other distribution". > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Vladimir Rodionov <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:00 PM > Subject: Next big thing for HBase > > > Global optimization and performance tuning: > > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=19&ved=0CG8QFjAIOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mapr.com%2FDownload-document%2F52-MapR-M7-Performance-Benchmark&ei=QGuVUr-cA6ewjAL_94DoCQ&usg=AFQjCNH2Brlp5n2rIAarEbj39c_X_lnvDg&sig2=bLTKxbspEgsRN3bJXUnspQ&bvm=bv.57155469,d.cGE&cad=rja > > Some numbers from this report does not look right for HBase. I do not > believe that 5 RS on Fusion drive scores only 1605 reads per sec per node. >
