I've branched for 0.98. Trunk now builds as 0.99.0-SNAPSHOT. The new branch 0.98 builds as 0.98.0-SNAPSHOT. Checked the Git mirror, the new branch and POM updates have already made it over. Looks good.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute details > come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do the > svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in the > Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done. > > > On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm >> thinking about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1. >> >> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian >> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer. >> >> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened) >> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days. >> >> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading >> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book), >> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add >> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual). >> >> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057 >> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run >> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with >> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why >> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527 >> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the >> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except >> HBASE-7781. >> >> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done >> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration >> testing. >> >> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial. >> >> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed >> security features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this >> week. Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031. >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
