There're several test failures when running 0.94 test suite using jdk 1.7 So there is some work to be done before switching to jdk 1.7 for 0.94
Cheers On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected] > wrote: > Make sens to have trunk with JDK 7 too... But I'm not sure for 0.94... It's > mainly running in prod with JDK 6. So not sure we can align them all... > > > 2013/12/8 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > I think all builds should be running JDK 7. I don't want to be only > chasing > > JDK 7 related test issues on the 0.98 build alone. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > I agree. We should build 0.98 against JDK 7 instead of 6. JDK 6 End of > > > Public Updates since to February 2013. 0.98 is planned for 2014. Will > be > > a > > > year after that. So I think it's time to move to JDK 7. > > > > > > My opinion ;) > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > > 2013/12/8 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > > > > > I was looking for differences between the trunk and 0.98 builds since > > > > Jenkins projects for the former are passing while the latter are not. > > > Seems > > > > the trunk jobs are set up to use "JDK 1.6 (latest)" while the 0.98 > > builds > > > > are set up to use "JDK 1.7 (latest)". For the time being I have set > the > > > > 0.98 builds to also use JDK 6 to see if their results will mirror > trunk > > > > afterward. > > > > > > > > However, I think we should be using JDK 7 or OpenJDK 7 to run all of > > our > > > > builds 0.96+. What do you think? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > >
