drop hadoop1 from 0.98? (-1 from andrew)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two things being discussed here -- can we clarify where folks > stand on this? Here's how I'm interpreting it (please correct). > > deprecate hadoop1 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from stack, ted, enis, larsh, > andrew, amandeep) > default to hadoop2 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from ted, larsh) > drop hadoop1 from trunk? (-1 from enis, stack, andrew) > drop hadoop1 from 0.98? > drop hadoop1 from 1.0? (-1 from larsh) > > Relatedly -- is 1.0 going to be off of 0.98.x or a new compat breaking > release of the current trunk? > > My votes are: > +1 to deprecate on 0.98 and trunk > +1 to default to hadoop2 on 0.98 and trunk > +0 drop from trunk. (if 1.0 is off of 0.98, +1 drop from trunk) > -1 drop from 0.98 > > Jon. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For trunk, are we going to support hadoop 1.0 ? > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 for defaulting to Hadoop 2. > > > At Salesforce we run 0.94 with Hadoop 2 anyway :) > > > > > > -1 (or maybe -0) for removing Hadoop 1 support. Lot's folks will have a > > > lot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch. > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency? > > > > > > > > > +1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98. > > > > > > > > I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We > do > > > not > > > > want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cannot > > > > update their hadoops. > > > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe > > > > > > even just drop it in 0.98? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 deprecate > > > > > +0 drop > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > > Hein > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
