Ok, so I spoke too soon, the ASF Jenkins builds for 0.98 are both set up to
use "1.6 (latest)", but I had a test here that would fail on one build but
not another, locally on 1.6u43, and on some ASF Jenkins builds but not
others, and never on a 1.7 build (locally). Or a precommit build, which was
1.6u20. I thought JRE version was the variable but there is something else
uncontrolled here. That's actually worse. So scratch my above suggestions.
I am just going to cut my losses and move on.

I will not update the ASF Jenkins job configurations until when/if there is
further discussion.


On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I should also mention the precommit builds all passed, which suggests to
> me they are using JDK 7 also.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> HBASE-6104 introduced a feature developed and tested with JDK 7.
>> Subsequent to review and commit, two builds on ASF Jenkins began failing,
>> the 0.98 on Hadoop 1.1 build, and the trunk build. After chasing a red
>> herring that looked like a test only failure for a bit it seems the problem
>> was deeper and manifested on JDK 6. I have reverted the change, unscheduled
>> the feature from 0.98, and may return to it some time in the future after
>> the sting wears off. In the meantime, I have two suggestions:
>>
>> 1. We should set all of the primary builds like trunk and 0.98 on Hadoop
>> 1.1 to use JDK 7, like the other builds. The inconsistent use of JDK/JRE
>> version will be an occasional source of confusion.
>>
>> 2. We should explicitly set up jobs that use JDK/JRE 6 and name them as
>> such.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Reply via email to