Thanks guys. Don't forget that given that this is 1.0, we will need help from everyone! We should keep the discussion thread (1.0.0 wishlist) alive, and start filing jiras against 0.99.
To repeat here as well, I think we can first to a 0.99 release, labeled as a dev release, and then turn 0.99.x into 1.0, similar to 0.95 and 0.96 series. Enis On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > > Its a good thing for our community to have multiple people from different > orgs capable of doing releases -- stack, lars, andrew, etc.. > > Jon. > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:35 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > That's great! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Over on the tail of concurrent thread 'DISCUSSION: 1.0.0', Enis > > > > volunteered > > > > > (again) as 1.0.0 Release Manager. > > > > > > > > > > Unless objection, I'd say let this be so. We could run a vote but > my > > > > > thinking is that any one interested in RM'ing can just volunteer to > > do > > > > the > > > > > next one; it's healthy spreading the RM role IMO. > > > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] // @jmhsieh >
