+1 from me. I ran Integration Tests against an 11-node cluster and they passed. I also ran our smoke tests against it. That was fine as well. Finally, we ran a JDiff report and there were no incompatibilities outside of the ones we discussed in previous RCs.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:46 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 from me. > Downloaded the RC, ran in a 5 RS + 1 Master cluster. > Tested performance between 0.96 and 0.98 without tags. Not much difference, > looks the same overall. > Tested various encoders, looks good. > > Tested with visibility labels/ACLs, no exceptions in logs, looks good. > > Restart from 0.96.1.1 to 0.98 also looks good. > > Regards > Ram > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Anoop John <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Downloaded and verified signatures for hadoop1 and hadoop2. > > > > Done feature testing using hadoop2. Tested visibility labels, WAL > > encryption and cell ACL. > > Tested tags/visibility labels along with distributed log replay ON. All > > looks good. > > > > Done upgrade test from 96.1.1 to 98. All looks good. > > Integrations tests run with hadoop1 and hadoop2 . Looks good. > > > > > > -Anoop- > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > everything looks good except > > > > for the annoying "Failed to retrieve nio.BufferPool direct > MemoryUsed" > > > > debug line... > > > > > > > > > > We have a JIRA for that? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > -- Best Regards, Aleks Shulman 847.814.5804 Cloudera
