Migration from 0.94 to 0.98 is in fact supported. We tested migration with 0.98.0 and it worked. I believe LarsH at Salesforce did the same. Maybe you have some kind of environmental issue?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < [email protected]> wrote: > Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration? > > Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed: > 2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation: > fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.verifyNSUpgrade(NamespaceUpgrade.java:547) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.upgradeTableDirs(NamespaceUpgrade.java:133) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.run(NamespaceUpgrade.java:561) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeTool(UpgradeTo96.java:221) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeUpgrade(UpgradeTo96.java:211) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.run(UpgradeTo96.java:133) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.main(UpgradeTo96.java:257) > > Should -check have failed the same way? > > JM > > > 2014-03-18 15:44 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > > +1 > > > > - checked documentation and tarball > > > > - Ran unit test suite which passed > > > > - Ran in local and distributed mode > > - checked the UI pages > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Adding VOTE tag to subject > > > > > > and a clarification (pardon the typo): > > > > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up > this > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific > > Time > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this > as > > > 0.98.1. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for > download > > at > > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts > are > > > > also available in the temporary repository > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007 > > . > > > > > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > > > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up > > this > > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight > Pacific > > > Time > > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release > > this > > > > as 0.98.1. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
