+1 Might need a good set of documentation the first couple times, but seems reasonable. On Mar 26, 2014 9:04 PM, "lars hofhansl" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am thinking to stop releasing the tarballs without the security code. > They do not really add anything, the secure tarballs work perfectly OK > without security. The secure builds just have some source and class files. > > I would also get rid of the non-secure build completely and just have one > way to build HBase. > > Any objections? Are there any other reasons to build both a secure and > non-secure tarball? Export restrictions, or anything? > > I think that would also make it trivial to release the secure bits to > maven (but maven is black magic to me, so I do not know for sure). > > -- Lars
