On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd prefer if we got rid of one -- maybe mark all as 0.99 and remove > 1.0.0. > > When we branch 1.0, we rename 0.99 to 1.0 and create a 1.1-SNAPSHOT > branch > > and make trunk 2.0-SNAPSHOT (or 1.99-SNAPSHOT?). > > > > Wouldn't trunk become 1.1-SNAPSHOT? > > We want to be strict about our semantic versioning, so we need to guarantee that 1.0 clients and code (API, wire, and persistent stuff) will work against 1.1, 1.2, etc... If we do so, we don't get to accept or commit any compat breaking changes unless we have a 2.0-SNAPSHOT branch. Some ideas - (like removing zk) won't fly unless we have a 2.0 branch. > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:11 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I see we have both targets in Jira and some issues targeted to 0.99.0 > and > > > some to 1.0.0. > > > > > > Which one should we use? > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > // [email protected] // @jmhsieh > > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected] // @jmhsieh
