Except such a JIRA won't be actionable. We can't upgrade our jetty dependency if it's going to conflict with what Hadoop uses and brings in transitively.
On Sunday, May 18, 2014, Demai Ni <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good. I will open one if I can make it works on 96.x. > > Currently my change on Infoserver seems ok. RESTserver compiled, but I > can start rest. Need to play more tomorrow > > Demai on the run > > On May 16, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > You may want to open a JIRA with your findings. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Demai Ni <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > >> Ted, > >> > >> Thanks. I am changing the poms (both top and the one under Hbase- > server). > >> Due to the incompatible btw jetty 6 and 9, infoserver and RESTserver > need > >> code changes too. Well, something to play with this weekend. > >> > >> Demai on the run > >> > >> On May 16, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >>> HADOOP-10075 is not integrated yet. > >>> It doesn't have Fix Version(s) either. > >>> > >>> For HBase, you can change the version strings in pom.xml to match the > >> ones > >>> from your hadoop build : > >>> <jetty.version>6.1.26</jetty.version> > >>> <jetty.jspapi.version>6.1.14</jetty.jspapi.version> > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Demai Ni <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> hi, folks, > >>>> > >>>> wondering anyone already began to use Jetty 9 with HBase. We are > trying > >> to > >>>> use Jetty9 in hadoop, and got the following exceptions when start > HBase: > >>>> ... > >>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: > >>>> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler incompatible with > >>>> org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Context > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.InfoServer.fixupLogsServletLocation(InfoServer.java:74) > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> caused by the mis-match of Jetty9 and Jetty6(current HBase > dependency). > >>>> > >>>> On hadoop side HADOOP-10075 is pending. I am thinking about changing > >> hbase > >>>> code(0.96) to bypass the problem. > >>>> > >>>> Many thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Demai > >> > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
