+1
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, yao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (can anyone +2 this ?) > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Following up on the old DISCUSSION thread on moving to git [1], > lets > > > vote > > > > > (INFRA needs to see a vote). > > > > > > > > > > Move to GIT? > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 on yes, lets move to GIT > > > > > [ ] 0 on don't care > > > > > [ ] -1 on stay w/ current SVN setup. > > > > > > > > > > I'm +1. > > > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > P.S. The Mighty Talat Uyarer, who volunteered to run the migration > a > > > > while > > > > > ago is back with a vengeance and up for the job. > > > > > > > > > > 1. http://search-hadoop.com/m/WmXbV15hqqq > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > >
