Just a small suggestion
In the doc http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#git.patch.flow

it says
Develop and commit the patch against trunk/master first

I think we could update this clearly saying 'master'.  The stmt seems as if
we could commit to either of those.  May be it is only me but I feel better
to change it.

Regards
Ram


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>wrote:

> In addition I'd recommend not using a git repo that was cloned from the old
> read only mirror of SVN.
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You have to commit to master.  This is the svn trunk.
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:55 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Also the log of the master branch and the trunk branch does not match.
> >  The
> > > master seems to have more commits than the trunk.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ram
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:39 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I tried with a commit.
> > > > Reading the new doc added, should we commit to master or trunk or is
> to
> > > > both?
> > > > I committed to trunk but the same does not come in the master.
> > > > Also when i tried to merge my git clone that was pointing to the
> > existing
> > > > read only git repo is the udpates happening properly?  A fetch/merge
> > > almost
> > > > took an entire update and did not merge properly leaving most of the
> > > files
> > > > in bad shape.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Ram
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Nicolas Liochon <nkey...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Can we now commit again, or is the migration still in progress?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Nicolas
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I added to the refguide here:
> > > >> > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#git.patch.flow
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Also updated our build box references so point to git instead of
> > svn.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > St.Ack
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Thanks guys for checking.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Can we at least agree on always using something like the
> following
> > > >> flow
> > > >> > for
> > > >> > > checking in for now:
> > > >> > >  - Commit the patch to trunk.
> > > >> > >  - Try to cherry-pick the patch to 0.98 / 0.96 if possible
> > > >> > >  - If not, manually commit the patch to the branch.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > If the patch is applicable to the branch without issues, we
> should
> > > >> > > cherry-pick which will help us in merges / comparisons etc.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Enis
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > What Andy said.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I checked trunk and 0.96 branch content (compensating for
> above
> > > >> > commits).
> > > >> > > >  I confirmed list of branches and tags are the same.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Thanks for sending the note saying repo is open again Andy.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > St.Ack
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > >> apurt...@apache.org>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > That is unfortunate, because there was not an all clear sent
> > to
> > > >> dev@
> > > >> > .
> > > >> > > I
> > > >> > > > > suppose we are "lucky" that otherwise the diffs are fine.
>  So
> > I
> > > >> guess
> > > >> > > > it's
> > > >> > > > > open season on the Git repo then. Would have been nice for
> > folks
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > have
> > > >> > > > > waited for Stack or someone else to write back verifying
> file
> > > >> > contents
> > > >> > > > were
> > > >> > > > > good.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Anoop John <
> > > >> anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > No Andy. Those were commits to Git after the migration.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > -Anoop-
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > >> > > apurt...@apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > So someone made a commit to SVN **after** the migration
> > was
> > > in
> > > >> > > > > progress??
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Ted Yu <
> > > yuzhih...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Andrew:
> > > >> > > > > > > > The diff shown in
> > http://pastebin.com/Pvk3BH4icorresponds
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > > > > HBASE-11219
> > > >> > > > > > > > which was integrated to master and 0.98 last night.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > In my local git workspace for 0.98, I do see this
> > change.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > FYI
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > >> > > > apurt...@apache.org
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Infra has closed the migration ticket.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > I looked at tags for trunk/master and 0.98, and
> these
> > > look
> > > >> > > fine.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Unfortunately there are differences between SVN
> > > checkouts
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > Git
> > > >> > > > > > > > > checkouts. SVN has changes on trunk/master and 0.98
> > that
> > > >> did
> > > >> > > not
> > > >> > > > > make
> > > >> > > > > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > > > over to Git looks like.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > master/trunk: http://pastebin.com/dQ6SU2Dz
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > 0.98: http://pastebin.com/Pvk3BH4i
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > 0.96: Good!
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > 0.94: Good!
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > 0.89-fb​: Good!
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Stack <
> > > st...@duboce.net
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks T.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > The trunk test is still running fine.  Checkout
> > local
> > > >> looks
> > > >> > > > good
> > > >> > > > > > too.
> > > >> > > > > > > >  I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > tried a branch.  It seems right too.  Asking about
> > > >> > > discrepancy
> > > >> > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > tag
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > listings between the branches up in the INFRA
> > > issue.git.
> > > >> > > >  Working
> > > >> > > > > > on
> > > >> > > > > > > > file
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > compares of svn and git checkouts....  Will report
> > > back.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > St.Ack
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Ted Yu <
> > > >> > > yuzhih...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I pointed trunk Jenkins job to git repo and
> > > triggered
> > > >> a
> > > >> > > > build.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > So far the tests are running fine.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > FYI
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Ted Yu <
> > > >> > > yuzhih...@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I 'git clone'd master branch.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Ran mvn package.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Ran some tests.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Checked 'git log'
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Looks Okay.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Stack <
> > > >> > st...@duboce.net
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Migration looks done:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Next up is checking if it is all there.  I
> was
> > > >> going
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > > > check
> > > >> > > > > > > > later
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> evening but if anyone else wants to compare,
> > > >> that'd be
> > > >> > > > > grand.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> St.Ack
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Andrew
> > Purtell <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > apurt...@apache.org>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > I also have done trunk first then cherry
> pick
> > > to
> > > >> > > > branches.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Enis
> > Söztutar
> > > <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > enis....@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > crew).  On feature branches, lets see.
> > > >>  Squash
> > > >> > if
> > > >> > > > > messy
> > > >> > > > > > > > > history
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> (most
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > cases?)?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > One immediate example is HBASE-10070
> > branch.
> > > We
> > > >> > > > wanted a
> > > >> > > > > > > > smooth
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> merge, so
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > the branch history is clean and every
> > commit
> > > >> > traces
> > > >> > > > to a
> > > >> > > > > > > jira
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > (with
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > reviews
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > etc).
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > For "official" feature branches which
> will
> > be
> > > >> > pushed
> > > >> > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > main
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> repo, I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > think we should
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > require a similar thing. If people need a
> > > >> working
> > > >> > > > branch
> > > >> > > > > > > with
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> less-clean
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > history, there is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > no need to push that to the asf repo.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > The Accumulo doc makes for a good start
> > [1]
> > > >> > > > (ignoring
> > > >> > > > > > > where
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > their
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > branching
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > style is different to ours). It is
> > informed
> > > >> by
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > > Kafka
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> contributors
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > workflow doc, also a good read [2].
> When
> > in
> > > >> > doubt,
> > > >> > > > do
> > > >> > > > > as
> > > >> > > > > > > > we've
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > done
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > past: e.g. adding patch to JIRA for
> > > hadoopqa
> > > >> > run.
> > > >> > > > Dump
> > > >> > > > > > dev
> > > >> > > > > > > > > pains
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > suggested solutions into this thread.
> > Lets
> > > >> keep
> > > >> > > this
> > > >> > > > > > > thread
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > alive
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> with
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > issues we run into as a dev team and
> our
> > > >> > > (suggested)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > solutions.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > As
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> our
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > practice diverges from that outline in
> > docs
> > > >> > above,
> > > >> > > > > lets
> > > >> > > > > > > note
> > > >> > > > > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > add
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > doc
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > locally?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 for a local doc.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I like both of the documents. Kafka does
> > not
> > > >> touch
> > > >> > > on
> > > >> > > > > > merge
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > between
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > branches at all. I used to do
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > commit-to-master than cherry-pick in the
> > > other
> > > >> > > > branches
> > > >> > > > > > (if
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> applicable)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > otherwise create a different patch and
> > commit
> > > >> > > approach
> > > >> > > > > > > rather
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > than merges across release branches. This
> > is
> > > >> more
> > > >> > > > > similar
> > > >> > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > our
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > svn
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > model.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I think for existing release branches,
> the
> > > >> merge
> > > >> > is
> > > >> > > > out
> > > >> > > > > of
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > question
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> (if I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > understand this correctly). We always did
> > > >> > > trunk-first
> > > >> > > > > than
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > cherry-pick
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > into
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > branches approach, while Accumulo
> suggests
> > > >> that we
> > > >> > > do
> > > >> > > > > > > earlier
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > branch
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > first,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > then merge into master. Since I don't
> have
> > > >> > > experience
> > > >> > > > on
> > > >> > > > > > > this,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > not sure whether that will work for us or
> > > not.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I need to heads-up our FB brothers and
> > > >> sisters
> > > >> > > > too....
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > St.Ack
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > 1. http://accumulo.apache.org/git.html
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > 2.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Patch+submission+and+review#Patchsubmissionandreview-Simplecontributorworkflow
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Perhaps this has some useful
> formulae:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Customizing-Git-An-Example-Git-Enforced-Policy
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:10 PM,
> Talat
> > > >> > Uyarer <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ta...@uyarer.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Good news :)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > 21 May 2014 08:05 tarihinde
> "Stack" <
> > > >> > > > > > st...@duboce.net
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > yazdı:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > SVN has been flipped read-only.
> >  The
> > > >> > > migration
> > > >> > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > git
> > > >> > > > > > > > > has
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > started.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >  See
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7768
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > St.Ack
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:56 PM,
> > > Stack
> > > >> <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > st...@duboce.net>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:48
> PM,
> > > >> Talat
> > > >> > > > Uyarer
> > > >> > > > > <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > ta...@uyarer.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Hi All,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I created an issue for our git
> > > >> > migrating.
> > > >> > > > [0]
> > > >> > > > > > We
> > > >> > > > > > > > can
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > follow
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > our
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> migration status. Fyi
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thank you Talat,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > St.Ack
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >    - Andy
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth
> > by
> > > >> > hitting
> > > >> > > > > > back. -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Piet
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Hein
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > (via Tom White)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >    - Andy
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by
> hitting
> > > >> back.
> > > >> > -
> > > >> > > > Piet
> > > >> > > > > > > Hein
> > > >> > > > > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >    - Andy
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting
> > > back. -
> > > >> > Piet
> > > >> > > > > Hein
> > > >> > > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >    - Andy
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting
> back. -
> > > >> Piet
> > > >> > > Hein
> > > >> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to