See the thread: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-dev/201404.mbox/%3CCAMUu0w_KgwTLWkTc3W85H4yYuDSaEn=Ncf7ziRhhMZ=hfod...@mail.gmail.com%3E
There was no conclusion in that thread. But it should be ok to start a VOTE I guess. Enis On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Er, I mean no user should be running on a runtime less than 7, they are all > EOL... > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Should we be 1.7 only for trunk / 1.0? > >> This would mean using the 1.7 features. > >> > > > > I think this is prudent. Hadoop common is having a similar discussion and > > I think converging on consensus that they would be ok with their trunk > > including features only available in 7. > > > > > >> What about .98? > >> > > > > I don't think this is an option, because although no user should be > > running with a 7 runtime (and in fact performance conscious users should > be > > looking hard at 8), vendors will still have to support customers on 6. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
