Try compiling with Oracle Java 6. Same result ?
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Back in time of JDK6 GA - when I was still working in Sun's JDK team - we had > companies sitting on 1.4 and paying _a lot_ of money for Sun support of it. > So... > > That said, I think moving to JDK7 is pretty much has happened already for > HBase, because e.g. 0.98.2 can not be build with JDK6 because we see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8479 > in Bigtop CI. > > Cos > >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:29AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> Er, I mean no user should be running on a runtime less than 7, they are all >> EOL... >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Should we be 1.7 only for trunk / 1.0? >>>> This would mean using the 1.7 features. >>> >>> I think this is prudent. Hadoop common is having a similar discussion and >>> I think converging on consensus that they would be ok with their trunk >>> including features only available in 7. >>> >>> >>>> What about .98? >>> >>> I don't think this is an option, because although no user should be >>> running with a 7 runtime (and in fact performance conscious users should be >>> looking hard at 8), vendors will still have to support customers on 6. >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White) >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White)
