I didn't set any custom JVM setting. Cheers
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]> wrote: > Ted, > > do you have customized JVM settings for -Xmx, -XX:MaxPermGen? > > -Mikhail > > 2014-06-26 15:40 GMT-07:00, Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > I ran 0.98 test suite using hadoop-2 and it passed. > > > > Here is the OS: > > Linux k.net 2.6.32-220.23.1.el6.YAHOO.20120713.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 13 > > 11:40:51 CDT 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > I will run the suite again. > > > > FYI > > > > [INFO] HBase ............................................. SUCCESS > [1.577s] > > [INFO] HBase - Common .................................... SUCCESS > > [20.219s] > > [INFO] HBase - Protocol .................................. SUCCESS > [0.286s] > > [INFO] HBase - Client .................................... SUCCESS > > [36.419s] > > [INFO] HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ...................... SUCCESS > [5.076s] > > [INFO] HBase - Hadoop Two Compatibility .................. SUCCESS > [1.506s] > > [INFO] HBase - Prefix Tree ............................... SUCCESS > [2.605s] > > [INFO] HBase - Server .................................... SUCCESS > > [1:08:43.945s] > > [INFO] HBase - Testing Util .............................. SUCCESS > [1.242s] > > [INFO] HBase - Thrift .................................... SUCCESS > > [2:02.400s] > > [INFO] HBase - Shell ..................................... SUCCESS > > [1:41.594s] > > [INFO] HBase - Integration Tests ......................... SUCCESS > [0.895s] > > [INFO] HBase - Examples .................................. SUCCESS > [5.421s] > > [INFO] HBase - Assembly .................................. SUCCESS > [0.895s] > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > [INFO] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] Total time: 1:13:44.733s > > [INFO] Finished at: Thu Jun 26 22:02:13 UTC 2014 > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I'm finding that repeated runs of the unit test suite at the head of > >> branch > >> 0.98 intermittently fail. Individual tests do not, so this likely a > >> lagging > >> shutdown, port/resource conflict, and/or zombie test issue. I am > >> currently > >> bisecting commits on 0.98 branch since the last release in the hope of > >> pinning this down to a single change. Depending on how quickly that can > >> happen, the RC might happen on Monday or not. As things stand at the > head > >> of the branch, I'd not +1 the RC given the release criteria I've been > >> using > >> up to now. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Planning to roll the 0.98.4 RC on Monday 6/30. > >> > > >> > I should have done it this week. Sorry, got a little sidetracked. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Best regards, > >> > > >> > - Andy > >> > > >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > >> > Hein > >> > (via Tom White) > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > >> (via Tom White) > >> > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Michael Antonov >
