On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: ...
> As for the 'pain vs pain' comment: I am not really sure why. Groovy is > really > just a Java with added benefits of real lambdas, dynamic bindings, etc. > I understand what JMS means. We picked our poison long time ago. Why would we abuse users swapping it out for another especially when no big win. Consult old JIRAs for why JRuby. Suffice to say it was the best alternative at the time in spite of 'faults' (size, startup-time, etc.). But hey, times change. I like Sean's meta approach where he stands back and is trying to get away with differentiating 'user' and 'dev' needs, and users get the, careful kid-glove treatment. I think I see where he is going (accumulo-like custom shell?). If he succeeds in this distinction, I'd say come back then Cos w/ your groovy suggestion. It might fly better if it is just for devs. Also, if we are heading down this route, separating user and dev shell/scripting needs, lets put phoenix in the running as the user tool St.Ack
