bq. 1.0 to 2.0 we need to sure +1 on supporting rolling upgrade from 1.0 to 2.0
Cheers On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < [email protected]> wrote: > My opinion: > > If we have support for 0.98 to 1.00, support from 0.94 to 1.00 might be > pretty the same thing. > > After that, 2,0 might be far in the future. So 0.94 to 2.0 direct I'm not > sure it's required. 1.0 to 2.0 we need to sure. People looking to upgrade > from 0.94 to 2.0 might have to go to 1.0 first? I don't think it will be a > big constraint. But still, it all depends on the effort of work required to > implement upgrade from 0.94 to 2.0. If it's simple, let's to it. Else, > let's ask people to migrate to 1.0 first. > > Just my 2 ยข ;) > > > 2014-08-29 14:19 GMT-04:00 Esteban Gutierrez <[email protected]>: > > > Hello all, > > > > Per suggestion of Sean in HBASE-11860 I'm sending this to the list to > > discuss this idea: > > > > I've been thinking that we should support upgrades from HBase clusters > > running 0.94 to HBase 1.x initially. Do you guys concur that we should > > support that upgrade path to HBase 1.x and depending the adoption of 1.x > > consider to extend or deprecate the same functionality in HBase 2.x? > > > > regards, > > esteban. > > -- > > Cloudera, Inc. > > >
