Searching for 'hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before' in http://server.distparser.com:81/hbase/with_teds_patch/node8/hbase-server/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay-output.txt showed that testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart was the first sub-test to be run:
2014-09-01 08:41:12,266 INFO [pool-1-thread-1] hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before: security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart Thread=295, OpenFileDescriptor=380, MaxFileDescriptor=65536, What Ram described was different from the problem JMS reported - since "ABC" and "XYZ" were not written to hbase:labels table, the test would surely fail. Cheers On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:53 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < [email protected]> wrote: > To reproduce just ensured that > in TestVisibilityLabelsWithDefaultVisLabelService the testAddLabels and > then testVddAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart runs. > This ensures that the total no of labels is 17 and not 13. > > So may be when it runs in Jenkins the order of execution determines the way > the labels are added or deleted. > String[] labels = { SECRET, TOPSECRET, CONFIDENTIAL, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, > COPYRIGHT, > ACCENT, UNICODE_VIS_TAG, UC1, UC2 }; > static String[] labels1 = { "L1", SECRET, "L2", "invalid~", "L3" }; > static String[] labels2 = { SECRET, CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVATE, "ABC", "XYZ" > }; > > Count this excluding the repeated confidential, secret and private it gives > 17. So may be we can seperate the test cases? > > Regards > Ram > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > Cool! Glad to see I'm not the only one ;) > > > > Since it passed on Jenkins does it mean we need to add some additional > > tests? > > Le 2014-09-01 12:20, "ramkrishna vasudevan" < > > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > Am able to reproduce this locally. Will try to come up with a patch. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So I guess that's why we don't see the log you have added? It loops > and > > > > timeout and never reach that point? > > > > > > > > What's next? Anything else I can run/do/test/check? I can even > install > > > > Jenkins on those 4 servers.... > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-09-01 11:59 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > The patch I sent to Jean-Marc added a loop when retrieving labels. > > > > > > > > > > Looking at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://server.distparser.com:81/hbase/with_teds_patch/node8/hbase-server/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay-output.txt > > > > > , there was no log from DefaultVisibilityLabelServiceImpl w.r.t. > > labels > > > > ABC > > > > > and XYZ. > > > > > > > > > > The timeout of test was due to these two labels not written to > > > > hbase:labels > > > > > table. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ted sent me another patch to test. > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything is here: > > > > > http://server.distparser.com:81/hbase/with_teds_patch/ > > > > > > > > > > > > This specific test did not failed on hbasetest1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Only this one failed on node8: > > > > > > Tests in error: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay): > > > > > > test timed out after 60000 milliseconds > > > > > > > > > > > > Tests run: 1284, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And many tests failed on node1 and t430s. But all > > > > > > TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay failed with timeout. > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I have copied everything on the server so you look at > > whatever > > > > can > > > > > > be interesting. > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://server.distparser.com:81/hbase/node1/hbase-server/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay-output.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to send me anything you want me to test. Also, I can > > share > > > > all > > > > > > required information, like CPU, etc. if that helps. > > > > > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-09-01 0:06 GMT-04:00 Anoop John <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The addition of the 2 new labels would have failed (?) May be > we > > > log > > > > > the > > > > > > > return value of this addition in test and see the trace? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Anoop- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the output of successful test run, I saw: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-30 11:24:12,139 DEBUG > > > > > > > > [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=1,queue=0,port=56716] > > > > > > > > visibility.DefaultVisibilityLabelServiceImpl(252): Adding the > > > label > > > > > ABC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-30 11:24:12,139 DEBUG > > > > > > > > [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=1,queue=0,port=56716] > > > > > > > > visibility.DefaultVisibilityLabelServiceImpl(252): Adding the > > > label > > > > > XYZ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://server.distparser.com:81/hbase/node1/hbase-server/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay-output.txt > > > > > > > > , I don't see the above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The additional debug log confirmed that the two new labels > were > > > not > > > > > > read > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4 builds, 4 computers, 4 failed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://server.distparser.com:81/hbase/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if you want me to run anything else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-30 14:29 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jean-Marc: > > > > > > > > > > I couldn't reproduce the test failure - on Mac or Linux. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you apply the following and run test again ? > > > > > > > > > > http://pastebin.com/Z1czdBes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would reveal whether log replay didn't bring back the > > > labels > > > > > > > written > > > > > > > > > > prior to RS restart, or the new labels were not written > > > > > > successfully. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will see if I can build something where the logs are > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > uploaded so that will make easier to look at them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just pushed the files related to this test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.spaggiari.org/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.spaggiari.org/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay-output.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-29 20:05 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari > < > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are the logs for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay) > > > > > > > > > > > > > : http://www.spaggiari.org/hbase-0.98.6.logs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if you need any other file. This is the > > > > > standard > > > > > > > > output > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > -X. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was looking for the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase-server/target/surefire-reports/<test-name>-output.txt > > > > > > file, > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > could run the test with -Dtest.output.tofile=false > and > > > > > capture > > > > > > > > > > standard > > > > > > > > > > > > output too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by > hitting > > > > back. > > > > > - > > > > > > > Piet > > > > > > > > > > Hein > > > > > > > > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
