Thanks for checking the RC, even if late :-)

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote:
> My late +1.
>
> Checked sigs, checksums, dir layout, hadoop libs, ran local mode both
> binary artifacts, run LTT, shell smoke tests.
>
> It seems the INFRA issue is resolved. I just pushed the 0.96.3-SNAPSHOT
> jars to test.
>
> Enis
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> FYI,
>>
>> I have perfs tests running but so far, so good. Did also some other basics
>> test and found the same as what Andrew reported for JDK6 +
>> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistri
>> butedLogReplay.
>>
>> I will post the perfs tests results as soon as I have them (After this got
>> released probably).
>>
>> JM
>>
>> 2014-09-10 15:15 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>:
>>
>> > With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes.
>> > Thanks to all who tried out the RC and voted. Let's do it again next
>> > month.
>> >
>> > The source and binary convenience tarballs are probably already
>> > available for download on the mirrors. We are having Nexus issues (see
>> > INFRA-8326 and INFRA-8327,  among others), so I will be delaying a
>> > release announcement for a bit until hopefully Maven artifacts can be
>> > in place.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>> at
>> > > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>> > also
>> > > available in the temporary repository
>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>> > >
>> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> > >
>> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>> > >
>> > > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
>> > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
>> > (and
>> > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
>> > not
>> > > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
>> > set
>> > > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
>> > > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>> > >
>> > > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
>> > so
>> > > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
>> will
>> > be
>> > > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
>> fixes
>> > > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
>> > contributors,
>> > > and testers involved.
>> > >
>> > > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
>> > > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
>> > > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
>> > > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
>> > > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
>> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
>> > > returns no local data
>> > > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
>> > already
>> > > present on target server
>> > > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
>> > > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
>> > > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
>> > > CellScanner
>> > > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
>> > > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
>> > > HBASE-11878
>> > >
>> >
>> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
>> > > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
>> > > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
>> > > table
>> > > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
>> > > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>> > >
>> > > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>> > >
>> > > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>> > >
>> > > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
>> > > unexpected logs or results
>> > >
>> > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> > (00:00
>> > > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
>> > > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Best regards,
>> > >
>> > >    - Andy
>> > >
>> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>> > > (via Tom White)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> >    - Andy
>> >
>> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> > Hein (via Tom White)
>> >
>>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Reply via email to