Do you think is it worth the anounce? The release is not intended for general usage but for testing.
Enis On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < [email protected]> wrote: > Cool!!! First 0.99 is out!! It's the first stone for the road to 1.0... > > Enis, any concern if I relay the announcement you will send yo the Apache > Announce mailing list? > > JM > Le 2014-09-21 19:45, "Enis Söztutar" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > The vote passed with 4 +1s. Although there are known problems in perf, I > > will continue with the release flow since this is a non-production > release. > > The reason we are doing this release is to encourage more testing and > > finding out issues. > > > > I will send out announcement after 24 hours. Thanks everyone who have > > tested and voted. > > > > Enis > > > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 1) Confirmed. 2nd run gave similar results. > > > 2) Checked the logs and so far, nothing wrong. Looking at the > > > FilteredScanTest code now. > > > > > > Opened HBASE-12040 and HBASE-12042 > > > > > > 2014-09-21 7:48 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > Sorry, was HTML formated. > > > > 0.98.3 => 0,25 > > > > 0.98.4 => 0,25 > > > > 0.98.5 => 67,34 > > > > 0.98.6 => 67,49 > > > > 0.99.0 => 0,63 > > > > > > > > On my todo: > > > > 1) Get updated numbers from 0.99.0 > > > > 2) Take a look at the test code to make sure it still test the same > > > thing. > > > > 3) Re-run 0.98.4 and 0.98.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > 2014-09-20 23:01 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > J-M: > > > >> Can you reformat the numbers below - it is hard to read. > > > >> Maybe put them in multiple rows. > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I looked a bit closer to the numbers. Just for FilteredScanTest > for > > > now. > > > >> > > > > >> > Here are the results for the few last versions. Is it possible > that > > > >> > something went into 0.98.5 but not into 0.99? > > > >> > > > > >> > 0.98.30.98.40.98.50.98.60.99.00,250,2567,3467,490,63 > > > >> > I will re-run for 0.98.4 and 0.98.6. Numbers for 0.99.0 are > already > > > >> from my > > > >> > 2nd run. > > > >> > > > > >> > JM > > > >> > > > > >> > 2014-09-20 14:28 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > [email protected] > > > >> >: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Sure. I will. I will also update the numbers as soon as I have > the > > > new > > > >> > > one. Will also run some other perfs tests to compare with 0.98. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > JM > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 2014-09-20 14:02 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <[email protected]>: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Agreed. Will be good to fix it in 0.99.1. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> On Saturday, September 20, 2014, Stack <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > JMS file blocker against 0.99.1? > > > >> > >> > Good work boss > > > >> > >> > Stack > > > >> > >> > On Sep 19, 2014 7:00 PM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" < > > > >> > [email protected] > > > >> > >> > <javascript:;>> > > > >> > >> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Sorry, here is the destination: > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yo-A-f4tjchdT9R-hkh6CkcXrbBHG_K2Y_ptF9QPT1Q/edit?usp=sharing > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > 2014-09-19 21:55 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell < > > [email protected] > > > >> > >> > <javascript:;>>: > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari > > > >> > >> > > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > > Results are there: http://tiny.cloudera.com/sjeyn > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > I get "Access not possible" > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari > > > >> > >> > > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > > UniformRandomReadBenchmark is not working anymore: > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > 2014-09-19 05:18:54,719 INFO [0] > > > >> > >> hbase.HFilePerformanceEvaluation: > > > >> > >> > > > Running > > > >> > >> > > > > UniformRandomReadBenchmark for 1000000 rows. > > > >> > >> > > > > 2014-09-19 05:18:54,719 INFO [0] hfile.CacheConfig: > > > >> > >> > > CacheConfig:disabled > > > >> > >> > > > > Exception in thread "0" java.lang.AssertionError: > > Expected > > > >> > >> 0000472128 > > > >> > >> > > but > > > >> > >> > > > > got 0000472127 > > > >> > >> > > > > at > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluationCommons.assertKey(PerformanceEvaluationCommons.java:50) > > > >> > >> > > > > at > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluationCommons.assertKey(PerformanceEvaluationCommons.java:45) > > > >> > >> > > > > at > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HFilePerformanceEvaluation$UniformRandomReadBenchmark.doRow(HFilePerformanceEvaluation.java:295) > > > >> > >> > > > > at > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HFilePerformanceEvaluation$RowOrientedBenchmark.run(HFilePerformanceEvaluation.java:169) > > > >> > >> > > > > at > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HFilePerformanceEvaluation.runBenchmark(HFilePerformanceEvaluation.java:121) > > > >> > >> > > > > at > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HFilePerformanceEvaluation$2.run(HFilePerformanceEvaluation.java:87) > > > >> > >> > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > Also, on the performance side, I got very strange > > results. > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > Some tests are as fast as 0.98.6, some are WAY > slower... > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > Results are there: http://tiny.cloudera.com/sjeyn I > will > > > >> > restart > > > >> > >> the > > > >> > >> > > > tests > > > >> > >> > > > > tomorrow and get new numbers by mid next week. > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > Appart from that, it works. And since it's a dev > release, > > > >> I'm +1 > > > >> > >> with > > > >> > >> > > it. > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > JM > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > 2014-09-19 21:28 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell < > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> > >> > <javascript:;>>: > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Checked file sums and signature > > > >> > >> > > > >> Unpacked tarball, looked at directory layout > > > >> > >> > > > >> Started up a minicluster in tree, did a quick ingest > > test, > > > >> it > > > >> > >> > > succeeded > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Enis Söztutar < > > > >> > [email protected] > > > >> > >> > <javascript:;>> > > > >> > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > I am very happy to say that the second HBase 0.99.0 > > > >> release > > > >> > >> > > candidate > > > >> > >> > > > >> (RC1) > > > >> > >> > > > >> > is > > > >> > >> > > > >> > available for download at > > > >> > >> > > > >> https://people.apache.org/~enis/hbase-0.99.0RC1/ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Maven artifacts are also available in the temporary > > > >> > repository > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1039/ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Signed with my code signing key E964B5FF. Can be > found > > > >> here: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/enis.asc > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Signed tag in the repository can be found here: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=336a63b5f58bb1c4859e3c2b6a2f5c0d68a7d9e1 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > NOTE IN GIGANTIC LETTERS THAT THIS IS A DEVELOPER > > > RELEASE. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > DO NOT USE THIS RELEASE IN PRODUCTION. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > HBase 0.99.0 is a "developer preview" release, and > an > > > >> > >> odd-numbered > > > >> > >> > > > >> release > > > >> > >> > > > >> > as > > > >> > >> > > > >> > defined in > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> https://hbase.apache.org/book/upgrading.html#hbase.versioning. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > This release IS NOT intended for production use, and > > > does > > > >> not > > > >> > >> > > contain > > > >> > >> > > > any > > > >> > >> > > > >> > backwards or forwards compatibility guarantees (even > > > >> within > > > >> > >> minor > > > >> > >> > > > >> versions > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.x). Please refrain from deploying this over > > > important > > > >> > >> data. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.0 release is provided from branch-1, which will > > be > > > >> the > > > >> > >> basis > > > >> > >> > > for > > > >> > >> > > > >> > HBase-1.0 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > release. A few 0.99.x releases are planned before > 1.0. > > > The > > > >> > >> reason > > > >> > >> > > for > > > >> > >> > > > >> > doing a developer preview release is to get more > > testing > > > >> for > > > >> > >> the > > > >> > >> > > > branch-1 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > code > > > >> > >> > > > >> > that will be released soon as HBase-1.0.0. Thus, all > > > >> > >> contribution > > > >> > >> > in > > > >> > >> > > > >> terms > > > >> > >> > > > >> > of > > > >> > >> > > > >> > testing, benchmarking, checking API / source /wire > > > >> > >> compatibility, > > > >> > >> > > > >> checking > > > >> > >> > > > >> > out > > > >> > >> > > > >> > documentation and further code contribution is > highly > > > >> > >> appreciated. > > > >> > >> > > 1.0 > > > >> > >> > > > >> will > > > >> > >> > > > >> > be > > > >> > >> > > > >> > the first series in the 1.x line of releases which > are > > > >> > >> expected to > > > >> > >> > > > keep > > > >> > >> > > > >> > compatibility with previous 1.x releases. Thus it is > > > very > > > >> > >> > important > > > >> > >> > > to > > > >> > >> > > > >> > check > > > >> > >> > > > >> > the client side and server side APIs for > compatibility > > > and > > > >> > >> > > > >> maintainability > > > >> > >> > > > >> > concerns for future releases. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.0 contains slightly more than 1K issues > resolved > > > with > > > >> > many > > > >> > >> > > > >> > improvements > > > >> > >> > > > >> > and bug fixes. The theme of (eventual) 1.0 release > is > > to > > > >> > >> become a > > > >> > >> > > > stable > > > >> > >> > > > >> > base > > > >> > >> > > > >> > for future 1.x series of releases. 1.0 release will > > aim > > > to > > > >> > >> achieve > > > >> > >> > > at > > > >> > >> > > > >> least > > > >> > >> > > > >> > the same level of stability of 0.98 releases without > > > >> > >> introducing > > > >> > >> > too > > > >> > >> > > > many > > > >> > >> > > > >> > new > > > >> > >> > > > >> > features. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Some work has been under way to clearly mark and > > > >> > differentiate > > > >> > >> > > client > > > >> > >> > > > >> > facing > > > >> > >> > > > >> > APIs, and redefine some of the client interfaces for > > > >> > improving > > > >> > >> > > > semantics, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > easy > > > >> > >> > > > >> > of use and maintainability. 0.99.0 contains some of > > the > > > >> > >> completed > > > >> > >> > > > items, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > and > > > >> > >> > > > >> > the rest can be found HBASE-10602. Marking/remarking > > of > > > >> > >> interfaces > > > >> > >> > > > with > > > >> > >> > > > >> > InterfaceAudience has also been going on, which will > > > >> identify > > > >> > >> > areas > > > >> > >> > > > for > > > >> > >> > > > >> > compatibility (with clients, coprocessors and > > dependent > > > >> > >> projects > > > >> > >> > > like > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Phoenix) > > > >> > >> > > > >> > for future releases. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Starting with 0.99.0, the HBase master server and > > backup > > > >> > master > > > >> > >> > > > servers > > > >> > >> > > > >> > will > > > >> > >> > > > >> > also act as a region server. RPC port and info port > > for > > > >> web > > > >> > UI > > > >> > >> is > > > >> > >> > > > shared > > > >> > >> > > > >> > for > > > >> > >> > > > >> > the master and region server roles. Active master > and > > > >> backup > > > >> > >> > masters > > > >> > >> > > > by > > > >> > >> > > > >> > default > > > >> > >> > > > >> > will NOT be hosting any regions unless configured > > > >> otherwise. > > > >> > >> See > > > >> > >> > > > >> > HBASE-10569 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > and HBASE-11604 for more details. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > This release contains Phase 1 items for experimental > > > "Read > > > >> > >> > > > availability > > > >> > >> > > > >> > using > > > >> > >> > > > >> > timeline consistent region replicas" feature. A > region > > > >> can be > > > >> > >> > hosted > > > >> > >> > > > in > > > >> > >> > > > >> > multiple region servers in read-only mode. One of > the > > > >> > replicas > > > >> > >> for > > > >> > >> > > the > > > >> > >> > > > >> > region > > > >> > >> > > > >> > will be primary, accepting writes, and other > replicas > > > >> will be > > > >> > >> > > sharing > > > >> > >> > > > the > > > >> > >> > > > >> > same > > > >> > >> > > > >> > data files. Read requests can be done against any > > > replica > > > >> for > > > >> > >> the > > > >> > >> > > > region > > > >> > >> > > > >> > with > > > >> > >> > > > >> > backup RPCs for high availability with timeline > > > >> consistency > > > >> > >> > > > guarantees. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > More > > > >> > >> > > > >> > information can be found at HBASE-10070. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Other notable improvements in this release are > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Automatic tuning of global memstore and block > cache > > > >> sizes > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Various security, tags and visibility labels > > > >> improvements > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Bucket cache improvements (usability and > compressed > > > >> data > > > >> > >> > blocks) > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - A new pluggable replication endpoint to plug in > to > > > >> HBase's > > > >> > >> > > > >> inter-cluster > > > >> > >> > > > >> > replication to replicate to a custom data store > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - A Dockerfile to easily build and run HBase from > > > source > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Internal refactoring for abstracting away > zookeeper > > > >> usage > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Truncate table command > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Region assignment to use hbase:meta table instead > > of > > > >> > >> zookeeper > > > >> > >> > > for > > > >> > >> > > > >> faster > > > >> > >> > > > >> > region assignment (disabled by default) > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Better support for Cell interface internally in > > read > > > >> and > > > >> > >> write > > > >> > >> > > > paths > > > >> > >> > > > >> for > > > >> > >> > > > >> > better performance and flexibility > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Combining internal mvcc and seqId infrastructure > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Extensive documentation improvements > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Numerous improvements in other areas and bug > fixes. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > The release has these changes in default behaviour: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - hfile version 3 has been enabled by default > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Distributed log replay has been enabled by > default > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Slab cache has been removed (use bucket cache > > > instead) > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Some client facing APIs (HTableInterface, etc) > has > > > been > > > >> > >> > > deprecated > > > >> > >> > > > and > > > >> > >> > > > >> > replaced. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > We have also adopted an orca as the mascot for > Apache > > > >> HBase. > > > >> > >> See > > > >> > >> > it > > > >> > >> > > at > > > >> > >> > > > >> > https://hbase.apache.org/ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks for everybody who have contributed to this > > > release. > > > >> > Full > > > >> > >> > list > > > >> > >> > > > of > > > >> > >> > > > >> the > > > >> > >> > > > >> > issues > > > >> > >> > > > >> > can be found here: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325675 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Compatibility > > > >> > >> > > > >> > ------------- > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.x series of releases are preview of upcoming > 1.0 > > > >> > release. > > > >> > >> > > > HBase-1.0 > > > >> > >> > > > >> is > > > >> > >> > > > >> > planned to be wire compatible with 0.98.x and 0.96.x > > > >> > releases. > > > >> > >> > > Clients > > > >> > >> > > > >> and > > > >> > >> > > > >> > servers running in different versions as long as new > > > >> features > > > >> > >> are > > > >> > >> > > not > > > >> > >> > > > >> used > > > >> > >> > > > >> > should be possible. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > A rolling upgrade from 0.98.x clusters to 0.99.0 is > > > >> supported > > > >> > >> as > > > >> > >> > > well. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.0 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > introduces a new file format (hfile v3) that is > > enabled > > > by > > > >> > >> default > > > >> > >> > > > that > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.96.x code cannot read. Rolling upgrade from 0.96 > > > >> directly > > > >> > to > > > >> > >> > 0.99 > > > >> > >> > > is > > > >> > >> > > > >> not > > > >> > >> > > > >> > tested. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Direct migration from 0.94.x is also supported but > it > > IS > > > >> NOT > > > >> > >> > tested. > > > >> > >> > > > >> Before > > > >> > >> > > > >> > HBase-1.0 we expect to complete the test. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Binary compatibility at the Java API layer with > > earlier > > > >> > >> versions > > > >> > >> > > > (0.98.x, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.96.x and 0.94.x) is not supported. You may have to > > > >> > recompile > > > >> > >> > your > > > >> > >> > > > >> client > > > >> > >> > > > >> > code and any server side code (coprocessors, filters > > > etc) > > > >> > >> > referring > > > >> > >> > > to > > > >> > >> > > > >> > hbase jars. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.0 release introduces new APIs, and deprecates > > some > > > of > > > >> > >> > > > commonly-used > > > >> > >> > > > >> > client side APIs (HTableInterface, etc). However, > > client > > > >> side > > > >> > >> code > > > >> > >> > > is > > > >> > >> > > > >> > expected > > > >> > >> > > > >> > to be source compatible with earlier versions. > However > > > we > > > >> > >> advise > > > >> > >> > to > > > >> > >> > > > >> update > > > >> > >> > > > >> > your application to use the new style of APIs, since > > > >> > deprecated > > > >> > >> > APIs > > > >> > >> > > > >> might > > > >> > >> > > > >> > be removed in future releases (2.x). > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Supported Hadoop versions > > > >> > >> > > > >> > ------------------------- > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.0 release drops support for Hadoop-1.x > releases. > > > Only > > > >> > >> > > Hadoop-2.x > > > >> > >> > > > >> > releases are supported. Hadoop-2.4.x and > Hadoop-2.5.x > > > >> > releases > > > >> > >> are > > > >> > >> > > the > > > >> > >> > > > >> > most tested hadoop releases and we recommend running > > > with > > > >> > those > > > >> > >> > > > versions. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Earlier Hadoop-2 based releases (hadoop-2.2.x and > > 2.3.x) > > > >> are > > > >> > >> not > > > >> > >> > > > tested > > > >> > >> > > > >> to > > > >> > >> > > > >> > the full > > > >> > >> > > > >> > extend. More information can be found here: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > https://hbase.apache.org/book/configuration.html#hadoop > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Supported Java versions > > > >> > >> > > > >> > ------------------------- > > > >> > >> > > > >> > 0.99.0 release drops support for JDK6. Only JDK7 is > > > >> > supported. > > > >> > >> > JDK8 > > > >> > >> > > > >> support > > > >> > >> > > > >> > is experimental. More information can be found here: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > https://hbase.apache.org/book/configuration.html#java > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Voting > > > >> > >> > > > >> > ------ > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Please try to test and vote on this release by > > > 09/19/2014 > > > >> > >> 11:59PM > > > >> > >> > > PDT. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > This is a developer (beta) release, so we have a > > shorter > > > >> vote > > > >> > >> > time. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > [] +1 Release the artifacts as 0.99.0 > > > >> > >> > > > >> > [] -1 DO NOT release the artifacts as 0.99.0, > > because... > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Thanks for helping to get a stable release out! > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Enis > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > >> > > > >> Best regards, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> - Andy > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting > > > >> back. - > > > >> > >> Piet > > > >> > >> > > > >> Hein (via Tom White) > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > -- > > > >> > >> > > > Best regards, > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > - Andy > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting > > back. > > > - > > > >> > Piet > > > >> > >> > > > Hein (via Tom White) > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
