Probably. I think it's more important to the default settings, though, in order to make sure that we haven't regressed. There's nothing in this release that would suggest a negative impact, so we should be good.
________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> To: dev <[email protected]> Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:28 AM Subject: Re: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for download Got it! So I will re-run a randomWrite (to populate the table) and a randomRead with 64 bytes cells. Should that show the difference between the 2? 2014-10-02 13:25 GMT-04:00 Vladimir Rodionov <[email protected]>: Any read/scan from block cache test should show some improvement with >small KVs (1Kb is large). > >-Vladimir Rodionov > > >On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Lars, >> >> What is the exact use-case where I should see improvement? I can add it in >> my test script and re-run that part on 0.94.23 to compare. >> >> So 1k KVs, but most on the reads? On the writes? On scanning? Skipping? >> >> Thanks, >> >> JM >> >> 2014-10-02 12:43 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: >> >> > Thanks JM. >> > >> > >> > Looking forward to some perf numbers. 0.94.24 should have a bunch of >> > improvements. (Although PE will probably not show them as it operates on >> 1k >> > KVs, and so perf is dominated by moving the KVs around.) >> > >> > -- Lars >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> >> > To: dev <[email protected]> >> > Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:35 PM >> > Subject: Re: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for >> > download >> > >> > Downloaded, uncompressed, signature checked => Passed >> > Checked files (.TXT) and doc => Broken linkes in README.txt and 2.3.1 is >> > malformated. >> > Started standalone, checked logs and UI => Passed. >> > >> > Test suite JDK1.7 => Passed twice, failed once: >> > Failed tests: >> > >> > >> testExceptionFromCoprocessorDuringPut(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionServerCoprocessorExceptionWithAbort): >> > The put should have failed, as the coprocessor is buggy >> > >> > >> > >> testMultiRowMutationMultiThreads(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestAtomicOperation): >> > expected:<0> but was:<1> >> > >> > Test suite JDK1.6 => Passed twice in a row. >> > Create table, scan, put, get, disable, drop => Passed. >> > >> > Looks good to me too. +1 >> > >> > Perfs tests are running, I will report tomorrow or Friday. >> > >> > JM >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-10-01 19:41 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > Verified signtaure. >> > > Ran test suite - TestSnapshotFromMaster#testSnapshotHFileArchiving >> failed >> > > but passed when run alone. >> > > Done some random shell ops. >> > > All looks good >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 from me >> > > > >> > > > - Installed the binary release. >> > > > - checked signature >> > > > - checked docs, etc >> > > > - inserted some data >> > > > - flushed, compacted, scanned, etc, all good >> > > > - nothing strange in the log* >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > * I did find a message logged where we apparently do not escape >> binary >> > > > data correctly. That's not a new problem, though. Logged HBASE-12146 >> > for >> > > > that. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Please do not forget to vote for the release. Only two days left. :) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- Lars >> > > > >> > > > ________________________________ >> > > > From: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >> > > > To: Dev <[email protected]> >> > > > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:03 PM >> > > > Subject: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for >> > > download >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > The 3rd (and hopefully last) 0.94.24 RC is available for download at >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.24-rc2/ >> > > > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >> > > > >> > > > HBase 0.94.24 is a bug fix release with 13 fixes: >> > > > [HBASE-11923] - Potential race condition in >> > > > RecoverableZookeeper.checkZk() >> > > > [HBASE-11963] - Synchronize peer cluster replication connection >> > > > attempts >> > > > [HBASE-12023] - HRegion.applyFamilyMapToMemstore creates too many >> > > > iterator objects. >> > > > [HBASE-12077] - FilterLists create many ArrayList$Itr objects per >> > > row. >> > > > [HBASE-11405] - Multiple invocations of hbck in parallel disables >> > > > balancer permanently >> > > > [HBASE-11957] - Backport to 0.94 HBASE-5974 Scanner retry >> behavior >> > > > with RPC timeout on next() seems incorrect >> > > > [HBASE-12019] - hbase-daemon.sh overwrite HBASE_ROOT_LOGGER and >> > > > HBASE_SECURITY_LOGGER variables >> > > > [HBASE-12020] - String formatting on each RPC Invoke >> > > > [HBASE-12022] - Payloads on Failure attempt to serialize the >> byte[] >> > > > into strings. >> > > > [HBASE-12114] - Meta table cache hashing may access the wrong >> table >> > > > [HBASE-12090] - Bytes: more Unsafe, more Faster >> > > > [HBASE-12103] - Backport HFileV1Detector to 0.94 >> > > > [HBASE-12113] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-5525 Truncate and >> preserve >> > > > region boundaries option >> > > > >> > > > The list of changes is also available here: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327569 >> > > > >> > > > Here's the test run for this RC: >> > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.24/43/ >> > > > >> > > > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, >> and >> > > > vote +1/-1 by EOD October 3rd on whether we should release this as >> > > 0.94.24. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks. >> > > > >> > > > -- Lars >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >
