Yeah, I'm going to continue to tackle this from the perspective of HBase code, and will definitely proceed with caution. This is a huge change, and I'll do my best to
I would think that this changes functionality from the user's perspective. What will users need to know and do regarding this change once they migrate to 1.0? What prompted this change? On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, the concept of connection caching, aka, managed connections are going > away. See also HBASE-9117. I tried rebasing that monster patch a couple > weeks back and decided it wasn't worth it. If you're interested in tackling > this problem, I recommend biting off smaller chunks. > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Solomon Duskis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a question about managed vs. unmanaged connections in HBase 1.0. > > The new ConnectionFactory implementation and the Connection interface > don't > > seem to include the concept of managed connections for tables. Are > HTable > > managed connections going to be deprecated? > > > > -Solomon Duskis > > >
