The release vote passed with 4 +1's. I'll continue with the release. Thanks for testing the RC and voting.
Enis On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 due to it's a dev release. > > I've downloaded the RC, run it in pseudo cluster mode and works good. The > issue I hit is when trying to run a integration test and got following > error: > > java.lang.RuntimeException: > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DistributedHBaseCluster@dd606a not an instance of > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MiniHBaseCluster > > I guess it's fixed by HBASE-12617. > > > On 12/5/14, 7:26 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >+1 > > > >Verified signature and md5. > > > >Layout looks right (src and bin). > > > >Build it and ran it. Looks good. > > > >I've been running it the last few days on a cluster doing testing and > >basically works. > > > >St.Ack > > > >On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> We need at least one more vote for this. > >> > >> I had set a shorter (4 days) testing window since this is a > >>non-production > >> release. I can extend the voting period if anybody needs it. > >> > >> Enis > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Checked the book > >> > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts > >> > Ran unit test suite - passed. > >> > > >> > Will do some more validation, time permitting. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Setting aside the Interface discussions, here is my +1 for the RC. > >> > > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > Downloaded artifacts, > >> > > Checked sigs, > >> > > Checked crcs, > >> > > Checked the book > >> > > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts > >> > > Checked jars of hbase and hadoop in bin artifact > >> > > Checked version strings > >> > > Run in local mode > >> > > Run basic smoke tests in shell > >> > > Run LTT > >> > > Build the src artifact with hadoop versions 2.2.0,2.3.0,2.4.0, > >>2.5.0. > >> > > 2.6.0. Compilation with 2.4.0 and before is broken, but it is ok for > >> > > this RC. See HBASE-12637 > >> > > Checked maven repository artifacts by running the hbase-downstreamer > >> > > project test. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Reminder, Sat is the last day to vote on this RC. Please plan to > >>spend > >> > some > >> > > time on the RC so that we can iron out issues for the next 1.0.0RC. > >> > > > >> > > Enis > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Andrew Purtell > >><[email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1501. Pardon > the > >> > noise > >> > > > on > >> > > > a VOTE thread. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Purtell > >><[email protected] > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Phoenix PMC here, although I'm only speaking my own opinion. > >> Concur, > >> > > the > >> > > > > code takes liberties... We need to clean our own house. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Stack <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sean Busbey > >><[email protected]> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Compiling Phoenix master against 0.99.2, I got: > >> > > > >> > > http://pastebin.com/gaxCs8fT > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Some removed methods are in HBase classes that are marked > >> > > > >> > > with @InterfaceAudience.Private > >> > > > >> > > I want to get some opinion on whether such methods should > >>be > >> > > > >> deprecated > >> > > > >> > > first. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> There is no room for 'opinion' in this area. A bunch of work > >>has > >> > been > >> > > > done > >> > > > >> to remove ambiguity around our guarantees. The law as it stands > >> is: > >> > > > >> InterfaceAudience.Private means: "APIs for HBase internals > >> > developers. > >> > > > No > >> > > > >> guarantees on compatibility or availability in future versions. > >> ..." > >> > > > (From > >> > > > >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#code.standards). We can add > >> > > verbiage > >> > > > >> but > >> > > > >> you would have to have a perverse squint to interpret this "no > >> > > > guarantees" > >> > > > >> as "no guarantees -- after a deprecation cycle". > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> That said, we are an accommodating lot. I suggest you take the > >> list > >> > > > over > >> > > > >> to phoenix dev and that phoenix comes back with explicit asks > >> rather > >> > > > than > >> > > > >> this blanket list taken from a compile against their master > >> branch. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> As per Sean, this discussion does not belong on a dev release > >>RC > >> > vote > >> > > > >> thread, nor should it hold up its release. > >> > > > >> St.Ack > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Best regards, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > - Andy > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > >>Piet > >> > > Hein > >> > > > > (via Tom White) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Best regards, > >> > > > > >> > > > - Andy > >> > > > > >> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > >>Piet > >> > Hein > >> > > > (via Tom White) > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
