Ooh, good call, guys. Yeah, looks like all we'd need to do is move bootstrap.min.css and bootstrap-responsive.min.css onto our server and link to it relatively instead of with absolute links it has now. Seeing as how both of those CSS files are Apache License, should be easy.
-Dima On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah the js and css are all loaded though a cdn. It should be pretty easy > to change the urls to be protocol relative and then things should work. > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I had the same problem. We link to CSS which is http instead of forking > and > > serving it in the site (I believe this is the default practice). My > chrome > > extension refuses to connect to http links causing rendering problems. > > > > Enis > > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Dima Spivak <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Not sure if this is something to address in this thread or if I should > > file > > > a separate JIRA, but for some reason, accessing the site over https > gets > > > rid of the pretty CSS. Seems to happen in Chrome and Firefox. Anyone > > have a > > > clue why? > > > > > > -Dima > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Tweaking the layout of the website goes one of two ways. Either > > there's a > > > > configuration point exposed from the maven skin or there isn't. If > > there > > > > is, it's simply editing the appropriate custom tag in site.xml. If > not, > > > > we'll need to bring back the velocity site.vm template. > Configurations > > > are > > > > documented here: > > > > http://andriusvelykis.github.io/reflow-maven-skin/skin/config.html > > > > > > > > Tweaking visuals is now based on the theme. We can either choose > > another > > > > bootswatch theme, or write our own. That stuff is documented here: > > > > http://andriusvelykis.github.io/reflow-maven-skin/skin/themes/ > > > > > > > > Right now the site is separate from the book. In theory we could move > > > book > > > > content over to become site content, in which case it would be > managed > > by > > > > this same plugin. Short of that, we get into applying style via the > > > docbook > > > > plugin. I've looked into this a bit; it's not nearly as easy as > > applying > > > > reflow-maven-skin. The current leads I have for this are > > > > https://github.com/lcahlander/docbook and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/pmartin/phing-documentation-docbook/commit/8d8f0b81951c4e07420083b204599a6b9ef00537 > > > > . > > > > > > > > Honestly though, if we're looking at moving away from docbook, I > think > > we > > > > should consider a more modern toolset, Sphinx-doc, for example: > > > > http://sphinx-doc.org > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Misty Stanley-Jones < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely fantastic!!! Got pointers to how tweaking the website > > would > > > > > work? > > > > > > > > > > In the new year I hope to really get started on a restructure of > the > > > Ref > > > > > Guide. I've thought about asking to move to AsciiDOC or MarkDown > but > > > I'd > > > > > like to do a proof-of-concept and see if it really gets us anything > > we > > > > > don't already have with Docbook. It's less of a potential value > since > > > we > > > > > are not hosted on Github, which has great integration with AsciiDOC > > and > > > > > MarkDown. I'm very interested in improving the look and feel of the > > > doc. > > > > I > > > > > think a lot of it will be structural -- reorganizing and > re-chunking > > > > > content. > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, theming the Docbook is not as hard as you might > > think. > > > > > Have a look at the XSLT files. (I know, famous last words). > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > For those not following closely in JIRAland, I've two changes > that > > > are > > > > > > ready to go. First, there's transition over to a bootstrap-based > > > layout > > > > > for > > > > > > our home page. This work is done in HBASE-12688. This improves > the > > > > looks > > > > > of > > > > > > things and will make it pretty easy to update our look-and-feel > in > > > the > > > > > > future. Second, I fixed a build problem where the online book > > wasn't > > > > > > getting its intended styling. This is done in HBASE-12687. I'd > like > > > to > > > > > > update the book to look the same as the front-page, but getting > > > styles > > > > > into > > > > > > docbook is proving non-trivial. > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, both of these changes are pushed to master and we're > ready > > > for > > > > a > > > > > > site re-build with the new look. I'll make that happen tomorrow > > > morning > > > > > > unless I hear actionable objections. > > > > > > > > > > > > You can get a preview of things to come over one > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/site/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. I've been having a dialog w/ your crew that has been > > going > > > > on a > > > > > > > while... was wondering if any progress. > > > > > > > Grand, > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ryan Rawson < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm checking to see if our marketing and web team can help. > > The > > > > > > > > primary requirement is going to be ditching the mvn:site from > > the > > > > > > > > front page. "reskinning it" might not be so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, lars hofhansl < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > I just came across one of the various HBase vs. Cassandra > > > > articles, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > one of the main tenants of the articles was how much better > the > > > > > > Cassandra > > > > > > > > documentation was.Thank god we have Misty now. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (not sure how much just a skin would help, but it surely > > won't > > > > > hurt) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > From: Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > To: hbase-dev <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:46 AM > > > > > > > > > Subject: A face-lift for 1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In mind of the new release, I was thinking we should clean > up > > > our > > > > > > act a > > > > > > > > > little bit in regard to hbase.apache.org and our book. > Just > > > > > because > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > project started in 2007 doesn't mean we need a site that > > looks > > > > like > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > from 2007. Phoenix's site looks great in this regard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the home page, I was thinking of converting it over to > > > > > bootstrap > > > > > > > [0] > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > that it'll be easier to pick up theme, either on of our own > > or > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > pre-canned [1]. I'm no web designer, but the idea is this > > would > > > > > make > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > easier for someone who is to help us out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the book, I just want to skin it -- no intention of > > > changing > > > > > > > docbook > > > > > > > > > part (such a decision I'll leave up to Misty). I'm less > sure > > on > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > project, but Riak's docs are a nice inspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Do we know any web designers who can > help > > > out > > > > > with > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > CSS? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -n > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0]: http://getbootstrap.com > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://wrapbootstrap.com/ > > > > > > > > > [2]: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
