Thanks Ted, and although I used this issue as an example, it's not a specific concern with one issue or individual. I think we're all ready to graduate 1.0 and then let the 0.98 RM deal with maintaining an older-than-current-stable version, which will be totally fine, but as I said we're not quite there yet.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > HBASE-10499 has been integrated to all branches. > > Will pay attention in the future. > > Cheers > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > HBASE-10499 is the latest example where there's a problem reported > against > > 0.98 but the fix only goes in to 1.0 (or maybe even only 1.1). Certainly > > fixing a problem in more than one branch is burdensome and I don't mind > > pitching in for 0.98 backports, but we can't have problems reported > against > > 0.98 remain unaddressed save for my vigilance looking at branch-1 commit > > history for fixes people are leaving out. In effect this is a premature > > declaration that 1.0 is our stable release. Hopefully that happens very > > soon but that is not the case yet. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
