Yes, let's sink it. I dropped offline early yesterday to drive up to central Cali for the weekend and missed all of the excitement on HBASE-12782.
I will put up a new RC by Monday with a vote that closes Wednesday. If a couple PMC can help me out by voting on it quickly it will be fine. > On Jan 31, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm in the middle of verifying the RC, but I'm inclined agree with Lars due > to the severity of the issue and the fact that folks would need to wait ~a > month. > > Unless we pushed ahead and then did a shortened vote for 0.98.10.1? > > -- > Sean >> On Jan 31, 2015 8:00 PM, "lars hofhansl" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think we should sink this and include HBASE-12782, followed by a >> shortened voting cycle. >> -- Lars >> >> From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:43 PM >> Subject: [VOTE] The 2nd HBase 0.98.10 release candidate (RC1) is >> available, vote closing 2/3/2015 >> >> The 2nd HBase 0.98.10 release candidate (RC1) is available for >> download at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.10RC1/ and Maven >> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1059/ >> >> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >> >> The issues resolved in this release can be found at >> http://s.apache.org/7hO >> >> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00 >> -0800 GMT) on February 3 on whether or not we should release this as >> 0.98.10. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release. >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> >>
