Ok, thanks! On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry about that, this was an accident on my part. > > I've pushed my commit to the proper branch-1.0 and deleted the hbase-1.0. > > Jon. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Was this intentional? > > > > $ git fetch asf > > remote: Counting objects: 570, done. > > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (161/161), done. > > remote: Total 246 (delta 88), reused 0 (delta 0) > > Receiving objects: 100% (246/246), 35.09 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. > > Resolving deltas: 100% (88/88), completed with 49 local objects. > > [...] > > * [new branch] hbase-1.0 -> asf/hbase-1.0 > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] // @jmhsieh > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
