FWIW, the Region proposal (HBASE-12972) is ready for review. The companion issue for SplitTransaction and RegionMergeTransaction (HBASE-12975) needs more discussion but could be ready to go in a <= one month timeframe.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we can learn a lesson or two from the vendor marketing machines -- > a release timed with HBaseCon would be ideal in this regard. My obligations > to the event are minimal, so I'm willing to volunteer as RM for 1.1. Do we > think we can make some of these decisions in time for spinning RC's in > mid-April? That's just about a month away. > > -n > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm most looking forward to rpc quotas and the buffer improvements that > > stack has put in. So for me getting a 1.1 in May 1 would be cool. > > That would allow us to talk about what was just released at HBaseCon, and > > maybe even have 1.1.0 in production at places. > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > The only reason I can think of to make decisions now would be if we > want > > to > > > ensure we have consensus for the changes for Phoenix and enough time to > > > implement them. > > > > > > Given that AFAIK it's those changes that'll drive having a 1.1 release, > > > seems prudent. But I haven't been tracking the changes lately. > > > > > > I think we're all in agreement that something needs to be done, and > that > > > HBase 1.1 and Phoenix 5 are the places to do it. Probably it won't be > > > contentious to just decide as changes are ready? > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > On Mar 13, 2015 1:28 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > That was my question.. We can discuss them independently? Or is > there a > > > > reason not to? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Do we need to couple decisions for 1.1 and 2.0 in the same > > > discussion? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like what? Interface changes for Phoenix maybe? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
