+1 on letting HBase-TRUNK jenkins show coverage report.

Cheers

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:51 AM, 张铎 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Going to change the config of HBase-TRUNK jenkins to show findbugs,
> checkstyle and jacoco coverage report.
> The config has been tested on
> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-jacoco for nearly 30 times. Not
> much different from HBase-TRUNK unless it runs ~30% slower(the overhead of
> collecting information for code coverage).
> Thanks.
>
> 2015-03-12 5:08 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>:
>
> > +1, thanks a lot for improving our build hygiene.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Sean. This is great.
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > FYI I just finished chasing down the breakage for mvn site on all
> patch
> > > > builds.
> > > >
> > > > HBASE-13191 consolidates the few places in the test-patch code where
> we
> > > > hard coded MAVEN_OPTS.
> > > >
> > > > If you look at the PreCommit job now, we use the "set environment
> > > > variables" option to set MAVEN_OPTS and then everything else respects
> > > that
> > > > setting.
> > > >
> > > > I set the initial value to be a combination of the memory limitations
> > > we've
> > > > been actually running with (the ~6G was getting ignored) and the
> > permgen
> > > > needed for site.
> > > >
> > > > MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx3100M -XX:-UsePerfData -XX:MaxPermSize=256m
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I just made TRUNK and branch-1 builds use same jvm as patch-build
> > > > > (hadoopqa) -- i.e. jdku51 -- and I set the MAVEN_OPTS to be the
> same
> > as
> > > > > those of trunk build too, setting MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx6100m"... it had
> > been
> > > > > 3000.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours,
> > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I upped hadoopqa retention to keep last 100 builds and or last 7
> > > days,
> > > > > > whichever comes first.
> > > > > > St.Ack
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Branch-1 and master have stabilized and now run mostly blue
> (give
> > or
> > > > > take
> > > > > >> the odd failure) [1][2]. Having a mostly blue branch-1 has
> helped
> > us
> > > > > >> identify at least one destabilizing commit in the last few days,
> > > maybe
> > > > > two;
> > > > > >> this is as it should be (smile).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Lets keep our builds blue. If you commit a patch, make sure
> > > subsequent
> > > > > >> builds stay blue. You can subscribe to [email protected]
> to
> > > get
> > > > > >> notice of failures if not already subscribed.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> St.Ack
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-1.0/
> > > > > >> 2.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Stack <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> A few notes on testing.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Too long to read, infra is more capable now and after some
> work,
> > we
> > > > are
> > > > > >>> seeing branch-1 and trunk mostly running blue. Lets try and
> keep
> > it
> > > > > this
> > > > > >>> way going forward.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Apache Infra has new, more capable hardware.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> A recent spurt of test fixing combined with more capable
> hardware
> > > > seems
> > > > > >>> to have gotten us to a new place; tests are mostly passing now
> on
> > > > > branch-1
> > > > > >>> and master.  Lets try and keep it this way and start to trust
> our
> > > > test
> > > > > runs
> > > > > >>> again.  Just a few flakies remain.  Lets try and nail them.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Our tests now run in parallel with other test suites where
> > previous
> > > > we
> > > > > >>> ran alone. You can see this sometimes when our zombie detector
> > > > reports
> > > > > >>> tests from another project altogether as lingerers (To be
> fixed).
> > > > > Some of
> > > > > >>> our tests are failing because a concurrent hbase run is undoing
> > > > > classes and
> > > > > >>> data from under it. Also, lets fix.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Our tests are brittle. It takes 75minutes for them to complete.
> > > Many
> > > > > >>> are heavy-duty integration tests starting up multiple clusters
> > and
> > > > > >>> mapreduce all in the one JVM. It is a miracle they pass at all.
> > > > > Usually
> > > > > >>> integration tests have been cast as unit tests because there
> was
> > no
> > > > > where
> > > > > >>> else for them to get an airing.  We have the hbase-it suite now
> > > which
> > > > > would
> > > > > >>> be a more apt place but until these are run on a regular basis
> in
> > > > > public
> > > > > >>> for all to see, the fat integration tests disguised as unit
> tests
> > > > will
> > > > > >>> remain.  A review of our current unit tests weeding the old
> cruft
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > >>> no longer relevant or duplicates would be a nice undertaking if
> > > > > someone is
> > > > > >>> looking to contribute.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Alex Newman has been working on making our tests work up on
> > travis
> > > > and
> > > > > >>> circle-ci.  That'll be sweet when it goes end-to-end.  He also
> > > added
> > > > in
> > > > > >>> some "type" categorizations -- client, filter, mapreduce --
> > > alongside
> > > > > our
> > > > > >>> old "sizing" categorizations of small/medium/large.  His
> thinking
> > > is
> > > > > that
> > > > > >>> we can run these categorizations in parallel so we could run
> the
> > > > total
> > > > > >>> suite in about the time of the longest test, say 20-30minutes?
> > We
> > > > > could
> > > > > >>> even change Apache to run them this way.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> FYI,
> > > > > >>> St.Ack
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sean
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>

Reply via email to