On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> Let's postpone this vote. > Agreed. > > See the threads on dev@ titled "Clarifying interface evolution freedom in > patch releases" and "The Renumbering (proposed)". > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, "Enis Söztutar" <enis....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think the agreement is to continue with the RC. > > > > > > > One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised when I > noticed > > > method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated classes. This > > means > > > that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not work against > > > 1.0.0 which seems undesirable for a bugfix release. I read over the > book > > > section on compatibility and didn't see this addressed, so I thought > I'd > > > ask. > > > > > > I think this is allowed. Did not check it though. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > It's not allowed normally under semver. There's already another thread > > going on this though. > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
