Devs --

Branch-1.1 is officially closed for feature enhancements, with the
following exceptions: HBASE-11339, HBASE-13260, HBASE-13431.

Please limit commits to blocker and critical bug fixes. I also ask that you
please ping me as patches go in, so that I might review them in relation to
the testing that's been done. I do not require you wait for a +1 from me on
these issues, simply a courtesy notification. Please use your best
judgement re: the above request.

Thanks,
Nick

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> wrote:

> No.
>
> semver[1] has an explicit policy to have identifiers in this format:
>
> MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH[-IDENTIFIER]
>
> From [1]:
>
> Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as
> extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.
> Bullet point 9 in [1] talks about this. If we want to do "developer
> preview" releases, we should use 1.1.0-alpha, 1.1.0-beta kind of version
> name.
>
> [1] http://semver.org/
>
> Enis
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > Sorry guys,
> >
> > I'm know I'm very late in the process, but should we not release 1.2.0
> > instead of 1.1.0?
> >
> > 0.97 was for dev
> > 0.99 was for dev
> > Should 1.1 be for dev too? Should we keep even numbers for prod releases
> > and odd for dev?
> >
> > JM
> >
> > 2015-04-22 17:32 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > I would love to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260
> in
> > > if
> > > possible.
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org <
> > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to have it
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431
> > > > in.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jerry He <jerry...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You have my attention all the time, Nick :-)
> > > > > We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149.  Sean, Andy,
> > > Enis?
> > > > > Of course the last resort is we do nothing but document it with
> > manual
> > > > > workaround or manual jar replacement in 1.1.
> > > > > I am available to do any verification if there is any proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jerry
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to