So we want to aim for Hadoop 3 support in hbase 2.0? Hard to judge amount of work when it isn't out yet.
-- Sean On May 7, 2015 8:58 AM, "Jonathan Hsieh" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:28 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > With HBASE-11666 in place, can we now start to use JDK 7 language > features > > across the board, starting in 1.0.x? > > I know we had discussion, but it wasn't entirely clear whether that > > allowed for using JDK 7 language features or not. > > > > > > Or maybe just starting with 2.0? > > Also - since JDK 7 EOL'ed last month - should we force and allow JDK 8 > > features in 2.0? > > > > > +1 from me for the jdk8+hbase2.0. I believe hadoop 3.0 will be jdk8 only > and it makes hbase 2.0 to be as well. > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] // @jmhsieh >
