+1 - Checked signatures - Ran unit test suite - Exercised basic shell commands - Performed RAT check - Ran LTT in a mixed deployment (0.98.4 servers along side 1.1.0 servers)
Cheers On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > - Checked sums and signatures > - Unpacked src tarball, layout looks good > - Built from source with defaults > - RAT check passed > - Built from source with Hadoop 2.2.0 > - Unit test suite mostly passed. (See HBASE-13676.)* > - Unpacked bin tarball, layout looks good > - Spot checked docs, looks good* > - Ran LTT with 1M keys, latencies stable after warmup. Some minor issues > with log levels (HBASE-13673, HBASE-13674, HBASE-13675)* > > * - Carried over from previous RC > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Testing done with the new bits: > > > > - confirmed there's no difference between HBASE-13661 on branch-1.1 > > (07d9904) HBASE-13661 on branch-1.1.0 (e860c66). > > > > $ interdiff <(git show 07d9904) <(git show e860c66) 2>&1 | wc -l > > 0 > > > > - inspected compatibility reports vs. 0.98.0 [0] and 1.0.0 [1]. HTable > > issue from RC1 corrected. > > - extracted src tgz, structure looks good. > > - verified build of src tgz against hadoop versions (2.2.0/minikdc=2.3.0, > > 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.7.0), with both > > jdk1.7.0_67.jdk (mac) and jdk1.8.0_20.jdk (mac). > > - run LoadTestTool against standalone built from src tgz with FAST_DIFF > > block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, filed HBASE-13677. > > - built site from src tgz. site and book looks good. > > - extracted bin tgz, inspect structure. looks good. > > - run LoadTestTool against standalone from bin tgz with FAST_DIFF block > > encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good. > > - load the site from bin tgz. looks good. > > - ran Stack's hbase-downstreamer vs. the maven repo. tests pass. > > > > These validations combined with my previous testing means I'm +1 for this > > RC. > > > > [0]: > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/0.98.0_1.1.0RC2_compat_report.html > > [1]: > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.0.0_1.1.0RC2_compat_report.html > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I'm happy to announce the third (time's the charm) release candidate of > > > HBase 1.1.0 (HBase-1.1.0RC2) is available for download at > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.0RC2/ > > > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1078 > > > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > > available in the Apache keys directory > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc. > > > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=831f98dc3ba722be44792d10b67c2e57d9522caf > > > > > > HBase 1.1.0 is the first minor release in the HBase 1.x line, > continuing > > > on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > > > NoSQL communities. This release includes nearly 200 resolved issues > above > > > the 1.0.x series to date. Notable features include: > > > > > > - Async RPC client (HBASE-12684) > > > - Simple RPC throttling (HBASE-11598) > > > - Improved compaction controls (HBASE-8329, HBASE-12859) > > > - Scan improvements (HBASE-11544, HBASE-13090) > > > - New extension interfaces for coprocessor users, better supporting > > > projects like Phoenix (HBASE-12972, HBASE-12975) > > > - Per-column family flush (HBASE-10201) > > > - WAL on SSD (HBASE-12848) > > > - BlockCache in Memcached (HBASE-13170) > > > - Tons of region replica enhancements around META, WAL, and bulk > loading > > > (HBASE-11574, HBASE-11568, HBASE-11571, HBASE-11567) > > > > > > The full list of issues can be found at > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12329043 > > > > > > This release candidate is not materially different from the previous, > > > correcting the application of HBASE-13661. Because of the small > > difference > > > between this RC and the previous, and the extended period for which the > > > first RC was available, this vote window will be a continuation of the > > > previous window. > > > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:00 Pacific time on > > > 2015-05-13 as to whether we should release these bits as HBase 1.1.0. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
