I think there is some confusion here because I'd expect to make a 1.2 release branch from branch-1, eventually. Branch-1 is even helpfully versioned 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT. We have enough branches already (smile).
> On May 21, 2015, at 10:26 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Huh? We should create a 1.2 branch of branch-1. We do not need to have a > branch for every patch release.There's clearly something I am missing. > -- Lars > From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl > <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 10:13 PM > Subject: Re: Git branch-1.1.0? > > branch-1.1 corresponds to the (upcoming) 1.2.0 release. > > branch-1.1.0 was for the just released 1.1.0 > > Cheers > > > >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:00 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Just saw we have a branch-1.1.0 branch in git. What do we use that one >> for? 1.1.x releases should be tags on branch-1.1, no? >> Thanks. >> -- Lars > >
