On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Jurriaan Mous <jurm...@jurmo.us> wrote: ...
> > > > The thinking on the above method is that if doing bulk checkAndMutate, > that > > they should all be inside a single row? > That is correct. Although you can send out multiple requests to different > rows at once with the Async api. > > PromiseKeeper is a loaded term! See https://promisekeepers.org/#what ... > > (smile) > Ah I did not know since we don’t have those here. So it is better to > rename? Any nice suggestions? > No. It is fine. It can be our little inside 'joke'. > > > There will be a new AsyncResultScanner which handles incoming batches > of > > > result. It will not be possible to do next on it since this does not > makes > > > sense in an async context. There will be however a way to request a new > > > batch with a promise. > > > > > > > > I like this.... no next. What you thinking as means of specifying > > 'batches'? We've been trying to move away from specifying batches in > terms > > of row count to instead do batches of a particular size (See > HBASE-13441). > As I currently implemented them you can request nextBatch promises until > isClosed() is true. So if batches are based on size in the future it is > easy to change the internals. > > Grand. St.Ack
