2015-06-24 22:29 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <[email protected]>: > > > > Also, I tried to run IntegrationTestBigLinkedList and it fails: > > 015-06-24 19:06:11,644 ERROR [main] > > test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify: Expected referenced count does > > not match with actual referenced count. expected referenced=1000000 > > ,actual=0 > > > > What are the command line arguments passed? Verify cannot find any > references? >
I ran this: bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList loop 3 100 10000 /tmp/loop 10 I can retry with any other if it helps. > > > > > > > > And last I ran IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify but I have no idea how to > > interpret the result ;) > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters > > REFERENCES_WRITTEN=19800000 > > ROWS_WRITTEN=20000000 > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters > > REFERENCES_CHECKED=1036925998 > > ROWS_WRITTEN=0 > > > > This is a bit fishy. Again, what are the parameters passed? Did you run > with a clean cluster state? > Was always doing that before any test: echo "disable 'IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify'; drop 'IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify'" | bin/hbase shell And ran with this command: bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify loadAndVerify > > For these two tests, I think there is at least 3 or so bugs already fixed > in theory. Our tests and my 1.2B row tests on a previous branch-1.1 code > base was ok. > > Also, any idea why non of the tests pass on my side? I tried some of them individually and they passed: ------------------------------------------------------- T E S T S ------------------------------------------------------- Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestClockSkewDetection Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.69 sec - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestClockSkewDetection Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 But it prevents me to run the entire test suite at once. I will give it few more tries today... JM > > > > > > > So. It seems to be working on my cluster, but I have not been able to get > > any successful test. Therefore I'm a bit reluctant to say +1 and will > only > > say +/-0.... > > > > For pefs tests, I still need some more work on my clusters... So not for > > this release. > > > > JM > > > > 2015-06-24 16:25 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Ran test suite against Java 1.8.0_45 > > > Checked signature > > > Practiced basic shell commands > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.1 > > > > (HBase-1.1.1RC0) is available for download at > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.1RC0/ > > > > > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1087/ > > > > > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > > > available in the Apache keys directory > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > > > > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=af1934d826cab80f727e9a95c5b564f04da73259 > > > > > > > > HBase 1.1.1 is the first patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, > > continuing > > > on > > > > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > > NoSQL > > > > communities. This release includes over 100 bug fixes since the 1.1.0 > > > > release, including an assignment manager bug that can lead to data > loss > > > in > > > > rare cases. Users of 1.1.0 are strongly encouraged to update to 1.1.1 > > as > > > > soon as possible. > > > > > > > > The full list of issues can be found at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12332169 > > > > > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by midnight Pacific time > on > > > > Sunday, 2015-06-28 as to whether we should release these artifacts as > > > HBase > > > > 1.1.1. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > >
