I think it's clear enough that we can make source only releases. Correct me if I am wrong.
It should be unacceptable that our releases are indefinitely blocked. This is not a sustainable position. On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > For me, yes. the PMC duties say that we have to ensure things we release > meet the foundation policies on licensing. That we were mistaken for a long > period of time is different than knowingly approving releases that don't > meet the policy. > > I haven't seen much in the way of activity on either the ticket[1] or on > the legal-discuss@asf public list[2]. Maybe a short note that makes clear > the PMC is blocking several releases due to the issue would help? > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-222 > [2]: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/ > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We have made many releases that include that fat JRuby jar. For years. > > Would continuing releases until told otherwise be acceptable or > > unacceptable? > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I've got a more maintianable version ready to go up today, but that > won't > > > help speed up LEGAL-222. > > > > > > anyone have some juice with the legal PMC or know a lawyer that is > > willing > > > to weigh in? > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > >> On Aug 4, 2015 2:56 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> All releases are blocked on HBASE-14085. Let's get it resolved this > > week so > > >> we can resume releases. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best regards, > > >> > > >> - Andy > > >> > > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > >> (via Tom White) > > >> > > > > > > -- > Sean > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
